Modal Frequencies and Dynamic Behaviour of HAWT Structures: A Comparative Analysis of Steel and Composite Materials

IJEP 45(13): 1167-1173 : Vol. 45 Issue 13 (Conference 2025)

Y. Kamala Raju1 and P. Subha Rao2*

1. Gokaraju Rangaraju Institute of Engineering and Technology (GRIET), Department of Civil Engineering, Hyderabad – 500 090, Telangana, India
2. Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Department of Civil Engineering, Kakinada – 533 003, Telangana, India

Abstract

Horizontal axis wind turbine towers are widely used to generate renewable energy worldwide; however, their slender design means they lack stable dynamic behaviour under lateral loads. This study aims to analyze the modal frequencies of wind turbine towers using Autodesk Fusion 360’s simulation analysis tool. The research examines how structures built with different materials respond in terms of modal frequencies. The tool assesses how specific mass participation factors for different materials influence structural dynamics. These factors indicate how much mass participates in each mode shape. The results will provide engineers with valuable data for designing wind turbine towers, helping them select optimal materials for improved performance and stability. Fusion 360’s simulation features are used to create a 3D model of a skyscraper that is 87.6 m tall with varying diameters. This study investigates the modal frequencies of towers constructed from structural steel, high-modulus carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP). It demonstrates how properties of these materials affect structural movement. Comparing the modal behaviours of stainless steel (dominant frequencies: 0.866–0.867 Hz), CFRP (1.615–1.617 Hz) and GFRP (0.472 Hz), we see that CFRP’s frequency range is about 86–87% higher than GFRP’s and also exceeds steel’s by 86%. The mass participation variables for each mode and shape reveal how much of the structure’s mass is involved in its dynamic response, providing further insight into how each material influences the structure’s dynamic behaviour.

Keywords

Autodesk Fusion 360, Mass participation factor, Wind turbine tower, Modal analysis

References

  1. Yang, S., K. Lin and A. Zhou. 2025. Exploring the performance of horizontal axis wind turbine in yawed turbulent flows through wind tunnel experiments. Renew. Energy. 243: 122579. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.122579.
  2. Seitenov, D., N. Mir-Nasiri and M.H. Ali. 2019. ANSYS-based force analysis on a new horizontal axis wind turbine shield. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 653(1): 012048. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/653/1/012048.
  3. Boudounit, H., M. Tarfaoui and D. Saifaoui. 2020. Modal analysis for optimal design of offshore wind turbine blades. Mater. Today, Proc., 30: 998–1004. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.373.
  4. Zhang, P., et al. 2022. Operational modal analysis of offshore wind turbine tower under ambient excitation. J. Marine Sci. Eng., 10(12): 1963. DOI: 10.3 390/jmse10121963.
  5. Chen, J. and D. Jiang. 2010. Modal analysis of wind turbine tower. 2010 World non-grid-connected wind power and energy Conference. Nanjing, China. IEEE. pp 1–3. DOI: 10.1109/WN WEC.2010.5673234.
  6. Liu, S., et al. 2024. Analysis of NREL-5 MW wind turbine wake under varied incoming turbulence conditions. Renew. Energy. 224: 120136. DOI: 10.10 16/j.renene.2024.120136.
  7. Jonkman, J., et al. 2009. Definition of a 5-MW reference wind turbine for offshore system development. Technical report NREL/TP-500-38060. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. DOI: 10.2172/947422.
  8. Adhikari, S. and S. Bhattacharya. 2012. Dynamic analysis of wind turbine towers on flexible foundations. Shock Vib., 19(1): 37–56. DOI: 10.1155/2012/408493.
  9. Kiyoki, S., S. Yoshida and M. A. Rushdi. 2025. Machine learning-based prediction of 2 MW wind turbine tower loads during power production based on nacelle behaviour. Energies. 18(1): 216. DOI: 10.3390/en18010216.
  10. Jokar, H., M. Mahzoon and R. Vatankhah. 2020. Dynamic modeling and free vibration analysis of horizontal axis wind turbine blades in the flap-wise direction. Renew. Energy. 146: 1818–1832. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.131.
  11. Peng, M., et al. 2025. Modal analysis of mistuned wind turbine induced by blade local damage using continuum mathematical model. Renew. Energy. 252: 123520. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene. 2025.1235 20.
  12. Harger, A., et al. 2023. Modal analysis of 15 MW semi-submersible floating wind turbine: Investigation on the main influences in natural vibration. Wind. 3(4): 548–566. DOI: 10.3390/wind3040031.