Studies on Removal of Acetic Acid using Hydrophobic Polyvinylidene Fluoride Supported Liquid Membrane

IJEP 46(3): 195-204 : Vol. 46 Issue. 3 (March 2026)

V.S. Mamtani1,2 and A.K. Ghosh1,2*

1. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai – 400 094, Maharashtra, India
2. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Desalination and Membrane Technology Division, Trombay, Mumbai – 400 085, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Recovering acetic acid from wastewater and industrial effluent reduces water pollution and decreases overall costs through reuse. This study examines the extraction of acetic acid using a supported liquid membrane (SLM) system with laboratory-prepared hydrophobic polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) capillary membranes as support. Tri-n-octylamine (TOA) in 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (2-EH) and 0.1 N sodium hydroxide served as the organic liquid membrane and strip solution, respectively. PVDF support membranes were created via wet-spinning and characterized for surface roughness, water contact angle, thickness and porosity. The effects of TOA concentration, feed and stripping solution flow rates and support membrane thickness on the SLM’s extraction performance were analyzed. Approximately 90% of acetic acid was removed within 8 hr using 0.75 M TOA in 2-EH. The optimal support thickness, feed flow rate and stripping solution flow rate were 130 µm, 100 mL/min and 150 mL/min, respectively. A mathematical model was used to predict acetic acid extraction and was validated against experimental data, showing deviations of less than 10%. This study demonstrates the effective removal of acetic acid from aqueous waste streams using the SLM system.

Keywords

Acetic acid, supported liquid membrane, extraction, polyvinylidene fluoride capillary support, mathematical modelling

References

  1. García, N. and Caballero, J.A. 2011. Economic and environmental assessment of alternatives to the extraction of acetic acid from water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Resour., 50(18): 10717–10729. DOI: 10.1 021/ie201064x.
  2. Zhang, Y., Xu, L., Ye, G., Hou, C. and Wu, D. 2025. Recovery of acetic acid from wastewater using supported liquid membrane. J. Env. Chem. Eng., 116707. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.116707.
  3. Gao, E., Meng, R., Jin, Q., Yao, S., Wu, Z., Li, J. and Du, E. 2023. Highly effective mineralization of acetic acid wastewater via catalytic ozonation over the promising MnO2/g-Al2O3catalyst. Chem. Phys. Impact. 6: 100149. DOI: 10.1016/j.chphi.2022.100 149.
  4. Wisniewski, M. and Pierzchalska, M. 2005. Recovery of carboxylic acids C1-C3 with organophosphine oxide solvating extractants. J. Chem. Tech. Biotech. Int. Resour. Process Env. Clean Tech., 80(12): 1425–1430.
  5. Rodríguez-Llorente, D., Liu, Y., De Mello, J.C., García, J. and Larriba, M. 2023. Flow-based recovery of acetic acid from aqueous solutions using bio-derived terpenes as extracting solvents. Sep. Purif. Tech., 324: 124524. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur. 2023.124524.
  6. Zhong, X., Cui, C. and Yu, S. 2018. Identification of oxidation intermediates in humic acid oxidation. Ozone: Sci. Eng., 40(2): 93–104. DOI: 10.1080/01919512.20 17.1392845.
  7. Patil, K.D. and Kulkarni, B.D. 2014. Review of recovery methods for acetic acid from industrial waste streams by reactive distillation. J. Water Poll. Purif. Res., 1(2): 13–18.
  8. Bianchi, C.L., Ragaini, V., Pirola, C. and G. Carvoli. 2003. A new method to clean industrial water from acetic acid via esterification. Appl. Catal. B. Env., 40(2): 93–99. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00 144-3.
  9. Yu, L., Guo, Q., Hao, J., and Jiang, W. 2000. Recovery of acetic acid from dilute wastewater by means of bipolar membrane electrodialysis. Desalination. 129(3): 283–288. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-91 64(00)00068-0.
  10. Wu, H., Valentino, L., Riggio, S., Holtzapple, M. and Urgun-Demirtas, M. 2021. Performance characterization of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and ion exchange technologies for acetic acid separation. Sep. Purif. Tech., 265: 118108. DOI: 10.1016/j.sep pur.2020.118108.
  11. IJmker, H.M., Gramblicka, M., Kersten, S.R.A., Van der Ham, A.G.J. and B. Schuur. 2014. Acetic acid extraction from aqueous solutions using fatty acids. Sep. Purif. Tech., 125: 256–263. DOI: 10. 1016/j.seppur.2014.01.050.
  12. Harruddin, N., Saufi, S.M., Faizal, C.K.M. and Mohammad, A.W. 2018. Effect of VIPS fabrication parameters on the removal of acetic acid by supported liquid membrane using a PES–graphene membrane support. RSC Adv., 8(45): 25396–25408. DOI: 10.1039/C8RA03392G.
  13. Jullok, N. and Hang, B.C. 2020. Separation of acetic acid and water using reverse osmosis membranes. J. Appl. Membr. Sci. Tech., 24(1). DOI: 10.11113/amst.v24n1.168.
  14. Qin, Y., Sheth, J. and Sirkar, K. 2003. Pervaporation membranes that are highly selective for acetic acid over water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(3): 582–595. DOI: 10.1021/ie020414w.
  15. Cloete, F.L. and Marais, A.P. 1995. Recovery of very dilute acetic acid using ion exchange. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34(7): 2464–2467.
  16. Gandhi, T.P., Sampath, P.V. and Maliyekkal, S.M. 2022. A critical review of uranium contamination in groundwater: treatment and sludge disposal. Sci. Total Env., 825: 153947. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2022.153947.
  17. Malid, S.A.A., Saufi, S.M. and Harruddin, N. 2019. Supported liquid membrane for acetic acid extraction: Screening of membrane support preparation factors. IOP conference series mater. sci. eng., 702: 012047. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/702/1/012047.
  18. Kulkarni, P., Mukhopadhyay, S. and Ghosh, S. 2009. Liquid membrane process for the selective recovery of uranium from industrial leach solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(6): 3118–3125. DOI: 10.1021/ie800819q.
  19. Chiarizia, R. and Horwitz, E.P. 1990. Study of uranium removal from groundwater by supported liquid membranes. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 8(1): 65–98. DOI: 10.1080/07366299008917987.
  20. Ho, W.S.W. and Poddar, T.K. 2001. New membrane technology for removal and recovery of chromium from wastewaters. Env. Progress. 20(1): 44–52. DOI: 10.1002/ep.670200115.
  21. Goh, S.S., Rafatullah, M., Ismail, N., Seow, E.K., Ibrahim, M.I., Alamry, K.A. and Hussein, M.A. 2024. Supported liquid membrane with selective stripping for separative recovery of copper and zinc from plating wastewater. Results Chem., 10: 101685. DOI: 10.1016/j.rechem.2024.101685.
  22. Bhatluri, K.K., Manna, M.S., Saha, P. and Ghoshal, A.K. 2014. Supported liquid membrane-based simultaneous separation of cadmium and lead from wastewater. J. Membr. Sci., 459: 256–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.019.
  23. Yesil, H. and Tugtas, A. 2019. Removal of heavy metals from leaching effluents of sewage sludge via supported liquid membranes. Sci. Total Env., 693: 133608. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13 3608.
  24. Parhi, P. 2013. Supported liquid membrane principle and its practices: A short review. J. Chem., 2013 (1): 618236. DOI: 10.1155/2013/618236.
  25. Malik, M.A., Hashim, M.A. and Nabi, F. 2011. Ionic liquids in supported liquid membrane technology. Chem. Eng. J., 171(1): 242–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.041.
  26. Kaya, E. and Hasanoðlu, A. 2022. Removal of acetic acid from aqueous post-fermentation streams and fermented beverages using membrane contactors. J. Chem. Tech. Biotech., 97(8): 2218–2230. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.7100.
  27. Ziobrowski, Z. and Rotkegel, A. 2020. CO2/N2separation by supported ionic liquid membranes based on tubular ceramic support impregnated with selected ionic liquid. Macedonian J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 39(1): 101-108. DOI: 10.20450/mjcce.2020.1721.
  28. Harruddin, N., Saufi, S.M., Faizalb, C.K.M. and Mohammad, A.W. 2016. Evaluation of different polymeric membrane support for acetic acid removal by supported liquid membrane process. J. Teknol. 78(12). DOI: 10.11113/jt.v78.10046.
  29. Mamtani, V.S., Ghosh, A.K., Bhoje, R. and Mukhopadhyay, S. 2025. Preparation of polyvinylidene fluoride membranes with enhanced hydrophobicity and its applications in chromium recovery using supported liquid membranes in practical scale. Chem. Eng. Commun., 212(7): 1113–1131. DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2024. 2449430.
  30. Sun, H., Yao, J., Cong, H., Li, Q., Li, D. and Liu, B. 2017. Enhancing the stability of supported liquid membrane in phenols removal process by hydrophobic modification. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 126: 209–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.08.027.
  31. Takeuchi, H., Takahashi, K. and Goto, W. 1987. Some observations on the stability of supported liquid membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 34(1): 19–31. DOI: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80018-6.
  32. Tran, T.T.V., Nguyen, C.H., Lin, W.C. and Juang, R.S. 2021. Improved stability of a supported liquid membrane process via hydrophobic modification of PVDF support by plasma activation and chemical vapour deposition. Sep. Purif. Tech., 277: 119615. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119615.
  33. Mamtani, V.S., Ghosh, A.K. and Adak, A.K. 2023. A brief review on systematic approach to polymer selection for development of capillary/hollow-fibre membrane for practical applications. Mater. Tech. Rep., 1(1): 103. DOI: 10.59400/mtr. v1i1.103.
  34. Chen, Z., Rana, D., Matsuura, T., Meng, D. and Lan, C.Q. 2015. Study on structure and vacuum membrane distillation performance of PVDF membranes: II. Influence of molecular weight. Chem. Eng. J., 276: 174–184. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119 615.
  35. Drioli, E., Criscuoli, A. and Curcio, E. 2006. Supported liquid membranes (chapter 9). In Membrane contactors: fundamentals, applications and potentialities (vol 11). Elsevier. pp 308–344. DOI: 10.10 16/S0927-5193(05) 80010-5.
  36. Mishra, S. 2018. Mass transfer and coalescence in liquid-liquid systems with relevance to dispersion liquid membrane in hollow fiber contactor. ph.D. Thesis. Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai.
  37. Drioli, E., Criscuoli, A. and Curcio, E. 2006. Gas- liquid systems. In Membrane contactors: Fundamentals, applications and potentialities (vol 11). pp 127-162. DOI: 10.1016/S0927-5193(05)80005-1.