Bioremediation of Dye Effluent using Bacterial Consortium: Development and Efficacy of D-DE69

IJEP 46(9): 859-869 : Vol. 46 Issue 9 (September 2026)

R. Jaresh1, K.J. Sharmila1*, J. Raveena Jayam2 and T. Kamesh Srikharan1

1. Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, Department of Biotechnology, Chennai – 600 095, Tamil Nadu, India
2. Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Department of Bioinformatics, Saveetha School of Engineering, Thandalam, Chennai – 602 105, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Colour in the water; the effluent typically contains a mixture of heavy metals, persistent organic compounds and very high chemical oxygen demand, all bound-up with intensely coloured dyes. Once this mixture seeps into soil or natural water bodies, it can cause damage that is not easily reversed. In this context, the study examined a bacterial consortium, termed D-DE 69, consisting of Bacillus halotolerans and Bacillus subtilis, as a possible way to address the problem. Under carefully controlled conditions, this consortium performed strikingly well. It degraded Reactive Black dye and reduced COD by as much as 76.15%. That kind of reduction is not just a small improvement; it suggests that something substantial is happening at the chemical level. The authors did not rely only on colour fading to make their case, which is reassuring because many treatment methods merely decolourize without really detoxifying. Using HPLC, FTIR and GC-MS, they showed that the bacteria were not simply removing visible pigment from the water. Instead, the analyses point to an actual breakdown of the dye molecules, with complex structures being converted into simpler, presumably less toxic compounds. The system seemed to work best around neutral pH, with moderate temperature and steady shaking, conditions under which the two Bacillus species appeared to complement one another metabolically rather than compete. Routine water quality parameters backed up this picture. There were noticeable drops in BOD, total dissolved solids and even heavy metal levels. So the treatment did not look like a quick cosmetic fix; it suggested broader improvement in wastewater quality. When compared with more conventional physical or chemical methods, biological approach also avoided several familiar problems. Even so, it would be a stretch to present bacterial consortia as a fully ready solution. Performance in the field can diverge quite a bit from neat laboratory results, especially in large, variable effluent streams. There is also the lingering concern of partial degradation, where intermediates may remain in the environment rather than being fully mineralized. So, while consortium-based bioremediation looks genuinely promising for treating textile dye effluent, its reliability outside controlled conditions and its long-term stability still need closer and perhaps somewhat skeptical, evaluation before one can argue confidently for widespread industry adoption. Enhancing consortium stability, investigating genetically modified strains and combining bioremediation with physicochemical techniques for more efficient and scalable applications should be the main goals of future research.

Keywords

Bacterial consortium, degradation, Chemical oxygen demand removal efficiency, Gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared, High performance liquid chromatography     

References

  1. Washbrook, D. A. 1988. Progress and problems: South Asian economic and social history c.1720—1860. Modern Asian Studies. 22(1): 57–96. DOI: 10.1017/S0026749X00009410.
  2. Barathi, S. and Arulselvi, P. I. 2015. Isolation and characterization of textile dye degrading native bacterial strains from textile effluent contaminated sites. Int. J. Multidisciplinary Res. Develop., 2(4): 155-160.
  3. Bhatia, D., Sharma, N.R., Kanwar, R. and Singh, J. 2018. Physico-chemical assessment of industrial textile effluents of Punjab (India). Appl. Water Sci., 8: 83. DOI: 10.1007/s13201-018-0728-4.
  4. Bheemaraddi, M. C., Patil, S., Shivannavar, C. T. and Gaddad, S.M. 2014. Isolation and characterization of Paracoccus sp. GSM2 capable of degrading textile azo dye Reactive Violet 5. Sci. World J., 410704. DOI: 10.1155/2014/410704.
  5. Chakraborty, S., Purkait, M.K., Dasgupta, S., De, S. and Basu, J.K. 2003. Nanofiltration of textile plant effluent for colour removal and reduction in COD. Separation Purif. Tech., 31(2): 141-151. DOI: 10.101 6/S1383-5866(02)00177-6.
  6. Jacob, E., Jose, R., Ullas, G. and Paul, N.M. 2020. Isolation and molecular characterization of azo-dye degrading bacteria from soil. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2263(1): 040008. DOI: 10.1063/5.00 18150.
  7. Bayoumi, M.N., Al-Wasify, R.S. and Hamed, S.R. 2014. Bioremediation of textile wastewater dyes using local bacterial isolates. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 3(12): 962-970.
  8. Wang, H., Zheng, X.W., Su, J.Q., Tian, Y., Xiong, X.J. and Zheng, T.L. 2009. Biological decoluorization of the reactive dyes Reactive Black 5 by a novel isolated bacterial strain Enterobacter sp. EC3. J. Hazard. Mater., 171(1–3): 654–659. DOI: 10.10 16/j.jhazmat.2009.06.050.
  9. Verma, P. and Madamwar, D. 2003. Decolourization of synthetic dyes by a newly isolated strain of Serratia marcescens. World J. Microbiol. Biotech., 19(6): 615-618. DOI:10.1023/A:1025115801331.
  10. Jadhav, S. B., Phugare, S. S., Patil, P. S. and Jadhav, J. P. 2011. Biochemical degradation pathway of textile dye Remazol Red and subsequent toxicological evaluation by cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and oxidative stress studies. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation. 65(6): 733–743. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2011. 04.003.
  11. Tony, B.D., Goyal, D. and Khanna, S. 2009. Decolourization of textile azo dyes by aerobic bacterial consortium. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation. 63(4): 462–469. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.01.003.
  12. Ali, N., Hameed, A. and Ahmed, S. 2009. Physicochemical characterization and bioremediation perspective of textile effluent, dyes and metals by indigenous bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater., 164(1): 322–328. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.006.
  13. Vijayaraj, A.S., Mohandass, C., Joshi, D. and Rajput, N. 2018. Effective bioremediation and toxicity assessment of tannery wastewaters treated with indigenous bacteria. 3 Biotech. 8(10): 428. DOI: 10.1007/s13205-018-1444-3.
  14. Osail, S., Sanny, S. and Kabir, M. 2023. Bioremediation of hexavalent chromium by bacteria isolated from Buriganga river, Dhaka city. Stamford J. Microbiol., 13(1): 25–29. DOI: 10.3329/sjm.v13i1. 70411.
  15. Rima, S.A.J., Paul, G.K., Islam, S., Akhtar-E-Ekram, M., Zaman, S., Saleh, M.A. and Uddin, M.S. 2022. Efficacy of Pseudomonas sp. and Bacillus sp. in textile dye degradation: A combined study on molecular identification, growth optimization and comparative degradation. J. Hazard. Mater. Letters. 3: 100068. DOI: 10.1016/j.hazl.2022.100068.
  16. Nilmini, W.M., Kumari, H., Chandrasekharan, V., Wijayarathna, C.D. and Dilrukshi, C. 2021. Characterization of a multi-metal resistant Bacillus cereus strain TWSL_5 and it’s bioremediation potential for Cr, Pb, Zn and Fe. American J. Env. Sci., 17(3): 49-63. DOI: 10.3844/ajessp.2021.49.63.
  17. El-Sheshtawy, H. S. and Abdelkreem, M. 2020. Biodegradation of textile dye using consortium of bacterial strains isolated from industrial dye effluent. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-23680/v1.
  18. Xue, J., Wu, Y., Fu, X., Li, N., Sun, J. and Qiao, Y. 2020. Study on degradation characteristics and bacterial community structure changes of immobilized cells in straw-alginate beads in marine environment. Bioresour. Tech. Reports. 10: 100402. DOI: 10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100402.
  19. Afrin, S., Shuvo, H.R., Sultana, B., Islam, F., Rus’d, A.A., Begum, S. and Hossain, M.N. 2021. The degradation of textile industry dyes using the effective bacterial consortium. Heliyon. 7(10): e08102. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08102.
  20. Bharagava, R.N., Saxena, G., Mulla, S. I. and Patel, D.K. 2018. Characterization and identification of recalcitrant organic pollutants (ROPs) in tannery wastewater and its phytotoxicity evaluation for environmental safety. Arch. Env. Contam. Toxicol., 75(2): 259–272. DOI: 10.1007/s00244-017-0490-x.
  21. CPCB. 2024. Water quality criteria. Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govt. of India.