IJEP 45(2): 179-186 : Vol. 45 Issue. 2 (February 2025)
Sheik Farid A., Ayisha Sidiqua M.*, Aishwarya C. and Seth Raman R.
B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Vandalur, Chennai – 600 048, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
In the construction industry, the depletion factor has necessitated the stringent implementation of practices that promote sustainability with regard to materials, techniques and operations, as well as construction project management. The construction industry has a substantial economic impact and offers an opportunity to resolve climate change and global issues. The relationship between management and sustainability enables the identification of components, structures and methods of integration. This study emphasizes the use of biomimicry as a strategy for promoting sustainability in the construction industry. Using energy modelling tools, such as Autodesk Revit and Green Building studio, the performance of three study sites was analyzed to determine mandatory energy specifications and areas for improvement. Additional biomimetic strategies are utilized as design alternatives, with the energy performance index used to illustrate the comparative analysis. Using snake-inspired facades in architecture can offer various advantages, drawing from the principles of biomimicry and natural design. In addition, energy use intensity benefit analysis provides additional insight into the rate of savings that can be achieved using biomimetic applications. Ultimately, aligning with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 11 (sustainable cities and communities), these strategies pave the way for realizing more resilient and environmentally conscious urban landscapes.
Keywords
Biomimicry, Energy performance index, Sustainability, Autodesk Revit, Green Building studio
References
- Pathak, S. 2019. Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. Int. J. New Tech. Res., 5(6): 34–38. doi: 10.31871/ijntr.5.6.17.
- Olusegun, O.A. and A.O. Clinton. 2018. Biomimicry problem-based approach as a strategy for sustainable innovations in the construction industry. Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manage., (July): 2771–2777.
- Imani, N. and B. Vale. 2022. Developing a method to connect thermal physiology in animals and plants to the design of energy efficient buildings. Biomimetics. 7(2): 67. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics 702 0067.
- Ilieva, L., et al. 2022. Biomimicry as a sustainable design methodology- Introducing the biomimicry for sustainability framework. Biomimetics. 7(2): 1–13. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7020037.
- Jamei, E. and Z. Vrcelj. 2021. Biomimicry and the built environment, learning from nature’s solutions. Appl. Sci., 11(16): 7514. doi: 10.3390/app111 67514.
- Huang, B.N., M. J. Hwang and C. W. Yang. 2008. Does more energy consumption bolster economic growth? An application of the non-linear threshold regression model. Energy Policy. 36(2): 775–786. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.002.
- Jenkins, D. and M. Newborough. 2007. An approach for estimating the carbon emissions associated with office lighting with a daylight contribution. Appl. Energy. 84(6): 608–622. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2007.02.002.
- Chirarattananon, S., P. Chaiwiwatworakul and S. Pattanasethanon. 2002. Daylight availability and models for global and diffuse horizontal illuminance and irradiance for Bangkok. Renew. Energy. 26(1): 69–89. doi: 10.1016/S0960-1481(01)0009
9-4. - Krarti, M., P. M. Erickson and T. C. Hillman. 2005. A simplified method to estimate energy savings of artificial lighting use from daylighting. Build. Env., 40(6): 747–754. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2004. 08.007.
- Wu, M.K.T. and K.K. Lam. 2003. Office lighting retrofit using t5 fluorescent lamps and electronic ballasts. HKIE Transactions. 10(1): 55–60. doi: 10.1080/1023697X.2003.10667 902.
- Öztürk, L. D. 2008. Determination of energy losses in lighting in terms of good vision efficiency. Archit. Sci. Rev., 51(1): 39–47. doi: 10.3763/asre.2008. 5106.
- Chel, A., G. N. Tiwari and A. Chandra. 2009. A model for estimation of daylight factor for skylight: An experimental validation using pyramid shape skylight over vault roof mud-house in New Delhi (India). Appl. Energy. 86(11): 2507–2519. doi: 10.10 16/j.apenergy.2009.03.004.
- Doulos, L., A. Tsangrassoulis and F. Topalis. 2008. Quantifying energy savings in daylight responsive systems: The role of dimming electronic ballasts. Energy Build., 40(1): 36–50. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild. 2007.01.019.
- Li, D. H. W. 2010. A review of daylight illuminance determinations and energy implications. Appl. Energy. 87(7): 2109–2118. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy. 2010.03.004.
- Yassine, F. 2013. The effect of shading devices on the energy consumption of buildings: A study on an office building in Dubai. M.Sc. Thesis. The British University in Dubai, UAE.
- Koç, S. G. and S. Maçka Kalfa. 2021. The effects of shading devices on office building energy performance in mediterranean climate regions. J. Build. Eng., 44: 102653. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102 653.
- Omidfar, A. 2011. Methodology for designing contemporary high performance shading screen- The integration of form and the DIVA simulation tool. International building performance simulation association Conference. Sydney, Australia. doi: 10.131 40/2.1.1749.1203.
- Benites, H. S. and P. Osmond. 2021. Bioconnections as enablers of regenerative circularity for the built environment. Urban Plan. 6(4): 25–39. doi: 10.176 45/up.v6i4.4373.
- Kukk, V., et al. 2021. Airtightness of cross-laminated timber envelopes: Influence of moisture content, indoor humidity, orientation and assembly. J. Build. Eng., 44(6): 102610. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe. 2021.102610.
- Kancane, L., R. Vanaga and A. Blumberga. 2016. Modelling of building envelope’s thermal properties by applying phase change materials. Energy Procedia. 95(10): 175–180. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro. 2016.09.041.
- Anh, L.D.H. and Z. Pásztory. 2021. An overview of factors influencing thermal conductivity of building insulation materials. J. Build. Eng., 43(3): 102604. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102604.
- IS 2. 1960. Rules for rounding off numerical values. MSD 3. Statistical methods for quality and reliability. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
