Helianthus annuus (Sunflower) and Gossypium herbaceum (Cotton) as a Phytoremediator of Chromium (Cr) in Tannery Wastewater

IJEP 45(4): 322-330 : Vol. 45 Issue. 4 (April 2025)

S. Monisha1* and S.P. Sangeetha2

Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (Deemed to be University), Department of Civil Engineering, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Chennai – 603 104, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Heavy metal pollution poses a significant threat to both the environment and living organisms. The release of heavy metals is a crucial indicator of environmental change, impacting ecosystems, agricultural productivity and human health. Industries, such as tanneries and mining are major contributors to this pollution. Chromium contamination, particularly from Cr (VI) used in industrial processes, like leather tanning, is extremely hazardous due to its toxicity and persistence in soil and water. Phytoremediation is an environmentally friendly method that uses plants to naturally uptake, accumulate and detoxify contaminants from the environment. This study aimed to assess the accumulation of chromium in soils and plants exposed to both simulated and industrial wastewater. It analyzed various parameters, including industrial wastewater characteristics, morphological characteristics of plants, seed germination percentage, soil pH, plant growth and accumulation of Cr in Helianthus annuus and Gossypium herbaceum. Over a 45 day period, chromium concentrations in soil and plants were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Helianthus annuus accumulated more chromium in its tissues compared to Gossypium herbaceum. Both Helianthus annuus and Gossypium herbaceum demonstrated significant potential as phyto-remediators. This study highlights the feasibility of using Helianthus annuus and Gossypium herbaceum for phytoremediation in chromium-contaminated soils, offering a sustainable approach to mitigating industrial pollution.

Keywords

Phytoremediation, Chromium, Tannery wastewater, Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Gossypium herbaceum, Helianthus annuus

References

  1. Lotfy, S.M. and M. Zhran. 2014. Phytoremediation of contaminated soil with cobalt and chromium. J. Geochem. Exploration. 144: 367-373. DOI: 10.10 16/j.gexplo.2013.07.003.
  2. Mant, C., et al. 2005. Phytoremediation of chromium by model constructed wetland. Bioresour. Tech., 97(15): 1767-1772. DOI: 10.1016/j.biorte ch.2005.09.010.
  3. Choppala, G., N. Bolan and J. H. Park. 2013. Chapter two-chromium contamination and its risk management in complex environmental settings. Adv. Agronomy. 120: 129-172.
  4. Alengebawy, A., et al. 2021. Heavy metals and pesticides toxicity in agricultural soil and plants: Ecological risks and human health implications. Toxics. 9(3): 42.
  5. Sajad, M.A., et al. 2020. Evaluation of chromium phytoremediation potential of some plant species of Dir Lower Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Acta Ecol. Sinica. 40: 158-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.chnaes. 2019.12.002.
  6. Dehghani, M.H., et al. 2016. Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution using treated waste newspaper as a low-cost adsorbent: Kinetic modeling and isotherm studies. J. Molec. Liquids. 215: 671–679.
  7. Abbas, N., et al. 2021. Phytoremediation potential of Typha latifolia and water hyacinth for removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Chem. Int., 7(2): 103-111. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.45594 06.
  8. Madrid, F., M.S. Liphadzi and M.B. Kirkham. 2003. Heavy metal displacement in chelate-irrigated soil during phytoremediation. J. Hydrol., 272(1–4): 107-119.
  9. January, M.C., et al. 2008. Hydroponic phytore-mediation of Cd, Cr, Ni, As and Fe: Can Helianthus annuushyperaccumulate multiple heavy metals. Chemosphere. 70(3): 531-537. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.06.066.
  10. Khalid, A., et al. 2018. Phytoremediation of Pb and Cd contaminated soils by using sunflower (Helian-thus annuus) plant. Annals Agric. Sci., 63(1): 123-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.aoas.2018. 05.007.
  11. Baker, A.J.M. and R.R. Brooks. 1989. Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements— A review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery. 1: 81-86.
  12. Al-Jobori, K.M. and A.K. Kadhim. 2019. Evaluation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) for phytore-mediation of lead contaminated soil. J. Pharmaceutical Sci. Res., 11(3): 847-854.
  13. Rezania, S., et al. 2015.Perspectives of phytore-mediation using water hyacinth for removal of heavy metals, organic and inorganic pollutants in wastewater. J. Env. Manage., 163: 125-133. DOI: 10. 1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.018.
  14. Farraji, H., et al. 2016. Advantages and disadvantages of phytoremediation : a concise review. Int. J. Env. Tech. Sci., 2: 69–75.
  15. Kaur, R., et al. 2018. Phytoremediation of heavy metals using cotton plant: A field analysis. Bulletin Env. Contam. Toxicol., 101: 637–643.
  16. Bhagwat, M.A., et al. 2020. Physiological characterization of cotton genotypes (Gossypium herba-ceum L.) for salinity at seedling stage. Int. J. Chem. Studies. 8(2): 2306-2312.
  17. Fozia, A., et al. 2008. Effect of chromium on growth attributes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). J. Env. Sci., 20(12): 1475-1480. DOI: 10.1016/S100 1-0742(08)62552-8.
  18. Mei, B., J.D. Puryear and R.J. Newton. 2002. Assessment of Cr tolerance and accumulation in selected plant species. Plant Soil. 247: 223–231.
  19. Bashir, T., et al. 2021. Chemistry, pharmacology and ethnomedicinal uses of Helianthus annuus (sunflower): A Review. Pure Appl. Biol.,4(2): 226-235.
  20. Deeba, F., et al. 2012 Physiological and proteomic responses of cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.) to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 53: 6–18.
  21. Corbineau, F. 2012. Markers of seed quality: from present to future. Seed Sci. Res., 22: S61–S68. DOI: 10.1017/S0960258511000419.
  22. Muhammed, S. 2021. Inductive role of the brown alga Sargassum polycystum on growth and biosynthesis of imperative metabolites and antioxidants of two crop plants. J. Env. Manage., 280: 111
    809.
  23. Halder, S. and A. Anirban. 2022. Removal of environmental pollutants (lead, chromium and cadmium) using root and leaf tissues of indian mustard, rice and wheat plants. BioRxiv.
  24. Ukhurebor, K.E., et al. 2020. Effect of hexavalent chromium on the environment and removal techniques: A review. J. Env. Manage., 280: 111809. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111809.
  25. Adekanmbi, I.C., P.O. Fabowale and A.O. Ogundare. 2024. Effects of cotton plant (Gossypium herba-ceum Linn.) extracts on some vancomycin and methicillin-resistant pathogenic bacteria. World J. Adv. Res. Reviews. 22(1): 1657-1670.
  26. Ram, B.K., et al. 2019. Effect of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] on phytoremediation potential and biochemical response of hybrid Napier grass with and without EDTA application. Plants. 8(11): 515. DOI: 10.3390/plants8110515.
  27. Walkley, A. and I.A. Black. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37 (1): 29–38.
  28. USEPA. 1992. Method 3050A: Acid digestion of sediments, sludges and soils (rev 1). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  29. Zhou, S., et al. 2022. Effect of silica-based nanomaterials on seed germination and seedling growth of rice (Oryza sativaL.). Nanomater., 12(23): 4160. DOI: 10.3390/nano12234160.
  30. Vazquez, M.D., C.H. Poschenrieder and J. Barcelo. 1987. Chromium VI induced structural and ultrastructural changes in bush bean plants (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Annals Botany. 59: 427–438.
  31. Baird, R.B., A.D. Eaton and E.W. Rice. 2017. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd edn). American Public Health Association.
  32. IS 3025. 1993. Methods of sampling and test (physical and chemical) for water and wastewater. Part 44: Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) (1st rev). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.