IJEP 45(7): 620-630 : Vol. 45 Issue. 7 (July 2025)
Manmehak Kaur Mavi and Ajay Kumar*
Panjab University, Department of Geography, Chandigarh – 160 014, India
Abstract
The scholarly article under discussion meticulously examines the numerous socio-economic factors that significantly influence the propensity to adopt climate-smart agriculture (CSA) practices within the specific geographical boundaries of the SAS Nagar district. The research rigorously examines the intricate ways in which various determinants, including but not limited to the size of agricultural landholdings, the level of educational attainment among farmers, their age demographics, their access to market facilities and the availability of suitable machinery, collectively influence both willingness and the capacity of farmers to implement CSA methodologies in their agricultural endeavours actively. Furthermore, the study thoroughly scrutinizes the pivotal role that government policy frameworks play in fostering the adoption of CSA practices, critically evaluating the efficacy of existing policies, subsidies and programmes designed to bolster sustainable agricultural practices within the region. The research findings underscore paramount importance of well-targeted policies and comprehensive socio-economic support systems in strengthening the resilience of agricultural practices in SAS Nagar against the challenges posed by climate change, thereby highlighting the need for an integrated approach that harmonizes local socio-economic conditions with overarching climate adaptation strategies. This research endeavour substantially enriches the academic discourse concerning the ways in which socio-economic dynamics, in conjunction with government interventions, can collaboratively facilitate the broader adoption of climate-smart agriculture, ultimately contributing to establishment of more sustainable and resilient agricultural systems in the specified region.
Keywords
Climate change, Climate smart agriculture, SAS Nagar district, Socio-economic factors, Government policy framework, Adaptation, Resilience
References
- FAO. 2020. The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020. Transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome. DOI: 10.4 060/ca9692en.
- Crippa, M., et al. 2021. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food. 2:1-12. DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9.
- FAO. 2013b. Climate-smart agriculture sourcebook. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/i3325e.pdf.
- FAO. 2019. Climate-smart agriculture and the sustainable development goals: Mapping inter-linkages, synergies and trade-offs and guidelines for integrated implementation. Food and Agriculture Organi-sation, Rome.
- Lipper, L., et al. 2014. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nature Climate Change. 4(12): 1068–1072. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2437.
- Sharma, A. and D. Bhattacharya. 2022. Prioritising climate smart agriculture. Kurukshetra: J. Rural Develop., 70: 45-49.
- The Asia Foundation. 2021. India’s experience with climate smart agriculture: Opportunities for triangular cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.
- CGWB. Northwestern region Chandigarh. 2022-23. Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Central Ground Water Board, Government of India.
- Statistical abstract of Punjab. 2022. Directorate of Statistics, Department of Planning, Government of Punjab.
- Pradhan Mantri krishi sinchayee yojana. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. Available at: https://pmksy.gov.in/About PMKSY.aspx.
- Sub-mission on agroforestry: Operational guidelines. 2016. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
- Sub-mission on agricultural mechanization: Operational guidelines. 2019. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
- MIDH schemes. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India. Available at: https://midh.gov.in/Schemes.html.
- CGWB. Northwestern region Chandigarh 2015. Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Central Ground Water Board, Government of India.
- MSME. Brief industrial profile of district SAS Nagar. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Institute, Government of India.
- Adams, R. M., et al. 1999. Effects of global climate change on agriculture: An interpretative review. Climate Res., 11(1): 19–30. DOI: 10.3354/cr011019.
- Aggarwal, P. 2003. Impact of climate change on Indian agriculture. Soc. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 30(2): 189–198.
- Banjara, T. R., et al. 2022. Sustainable alternative crop rotations to the irrigated rice-wheat cropping system of Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci., 68(11): 1568–1585. DOI: 10.10 80/03650340.2021.1912324.
- Chauhan, s.k. and R.K. nanda. 2009. Adoption of poplar-based agroforestry as an approach for diversified agriculture in Punjab. Indian Forester. 135 (5): 671–677.
- Imran, M. A., et al. 2018. Impact of climate smart agriculture (CSA) practices on cotton production and livelihood of farmers in Punjab, Pakistan. Sustain. (Switzerland). 10(6). DOI: 10.3390/su1006 2101.
- Jat, H. S., et al. 2019. Climate smart agriculture practices improve soil organic carbon pools, biological properties and crop productivity in cereal-based systems of northwest India. CATENA. 181: 104059. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2019.05.005.
- Jat, M. L., et al. 2019. Agricultural sustainability under emerging climatic variability: The role of climate-smart agriculture and relevant policies in India. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Develop., 1(1): 1. DOI: 10.1504/ijisd.2019.10020869.
- Kaur, B., K. Vatta and R.S. Sidhu. 2015. Optimising irrigation water use in Punjab agriculture: Role of crop diversification and technology. Indian J. Agric. Eco., 70(3): 307-318.
- Khatri-Chhetri, A., et al. 2016. Economic benefits of climate-smart agricultural practices to smallholder farmers in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Curr. Sci., 110(7): 1251–1256. DOI: 10.18520/cs/v110/i7/1251-1256.
- Kumar, S. 2023. Diversification of agriculture in India: A regional perspective. Int. J. English Literature Social Sci., 8(3): 301–312. DOI: 10.22161/ijels.83.49.
- Kumar, S. and B.K. Sidana. 2018. Farmers’ perceptions and adaptation strategies to climate change in Punjab agriculture farmers’ perceptions and adaptation strategies to climate change in Punjab agriculture. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 88(10): 1573-1581. DOI: 10.56093/ijas.v88i10.84226.
- Mahato, A. 2014. Climate change and its impact on agriculture. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publications. 4(4): 1-6.
- Malhi, G.S., M. Kaur and P. Kaushik. 2021. Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: A review. Sustain. (Switzerland). 13(3): 1–21. DOI: 10.3390/su13031318.
- Sidhu, R. S., K. Vatta and U. Lall. 2011. Climate change impact and management strategies for sustainable water-energy-agriculture outcomes in Punjab. Indian J. Agric. Eco., 66(3): 1-12.
- The Asia Foundation. 2022. India’s experience with climate smart agriculture: Opportunities for triangular cooperation in the Indo-Pacific.