Production and Mechanical Characterization of Mustard Husk Powder Reinforced Epoxy Composite

By /

IJEP 45(7): 661-669 : Vol. 45 Issue. 7 (July 2025)

Full Text

Anil Kumar1*, Gajanan S. Datar2, Dipti Grover3 and Bhawna Dahiya3

1. G.B. Pant Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University (DSEU), Mechanical and Automation Engineering Department, Okhla-I Campus, New Delhi – 110 020, India
2. Government College of Engineering and Research, Avasari, Pune – 412 406, Maharashtra, India
3. Kurukshetra University, Institute of Environmental Studies, Kurukshetra – 136 119, Haryana, India

Abstract

This research work deals with the production of a fiberboard using mustard husk powder (a type of agricultural waste) and epoxy resin, which can be used as an alternative to plywood. The aim of this research work is to determine the mechanical and microstructural properties of this novel composite. Various tests were conducted on various specimens to evaluate their strength and energy-absorbing capacity. Using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), the microstructure of the created fiberboard was also examined in order to understand the morphology and filler particle distribution within the resin. After fabrication and testing, it has been observed that the composite fiberboard has tensile strength of 11.5 MPa, flexural strength of 33.5 MPa, impact strength of 19.65 J/m2 and hardness of 20.68 (Vicker’s) which are comparable to those of the composites made from epoxy mixed with other agricultural wastes, such as walnut shell powder, pomegranate peel powder, etc. The SEM study revealed perfect bonding between the epoxy and the mustard husk powder particles, which enhanced the mechanical properties, making it a suitable and environmentally-friendly composite.

Keywords

Composite fiberboard, Mustard husk powder, Mechanical properties, SEM, Sustainable materials

References

  1. Mahmood, Z.S. and J. S. Chiad. 2020. Improving the mechanical characteristics of alloy steel DIN 41Cr4 by shot peening. J. Eng., 26(7): 1-15.
  2. Bensebaa, T., et al. 2019. Rotor performance enhancement through blade surging. Int. J. Micro Air Vehicles. 11.
  3. Dabkeya, R. K. and M. Lalwani. 2021. Mustard and cotton waste-based biomass gasifier simulation by using Aspen Plus. International Conference on Communication and computational technologies: ICCCT-2019, Singapore. Proceedings, pp 591–606.
  4. Torres, F.G. and M. L. Cubillas. 2005. Study of the interfacial properties of natural fiber reinforced polyethylene. Polymer Test. 24 (6): 694–698.
  5. Joszko, K., et al. 2023. mechanical and tribological properties of epoxy composites reinforced with food-waste fillers. J. Achievements Mater. Manufacturing Eng., 120(2): 49-58.
  6. Sharma, H., I. Singh and J. P. Misra. 2021. Effect of particle size on physical, thermal and mechanical behaviour of epoxy composites reinforced with food waste fillers. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 235 (16): 3029–3035.
  7. Kumar, A. and S. Singh. 2023. Fabrication and optimization of wear behaviour of Citrus limetta peel particulate composite using hybrid taguchi-GRA-PCA. Evergreen. 10(3): 1323-1329.
  8. Kumar, K. P. and C. Nagaraj. 2016. An investigation of mechanical characterization of orange peel reinforced epoxy composite. IOSR J. Mech. Civil Eng., 16(053): 33-41.
  9. Ojha, S., G. Raghavendra and S.K. Acharya. 2012. Fabrication and study of mechanical properties of orange peel reinforced polymer composite. caspian J. Appl. Sci. Res., 1(13): 190–194.
  10. Kumar, A., K. Dev and A. Dahiya. 2023. Fabrication and mechanical characterization of pomegranate peel powder mixed epoxy composite. evergreen. 10(4): 2173–2179. DOI: 10.5109/7160892.
  11. Reddy, V.S., et al. 2022. mechanical properties evaluation of pomegranate peel powder filled jute fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Mater. Today: Proceedings. 62(13): 6923–6926. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr. 2021.12.043.
  12. Natarajan, P., et al. 2024. Experimental investigation on mechanical and tribological analysis of pineapple leaf (Ananas comosus) and sisal (Agave sisalana) fibers reinforced hybrid epoxy composites. Int. Polym. Process. 39(2): 134–142.
  13. Borah, P.P., et al. 2022. Modelling of structural responses for pineapple leaf fiber epoxy composite. In Recent advances in materials processing and characterization. Ed A. Arockiarajan, et al. Springer Singapore. pp 199–210.
  14. Kumar, A., et al. 2024. Fabrication and mechanical characterization of composite fiberboard utilizing dry lemon peel powder and epoxy resin. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater., 11(3): 1259-1273. DOI: 10.17515/resm2024.394me 0812rs.
  15. Kumar, S. and A. Saha. 2024. Utilization of coconut shell biomass residue to develop sustainable biocomposites and characterize the physical, mechanical, thermal and water absorption properties. Biomass Conv. Bioref., 14: 12815–12831. DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-03293-4.
  16. Akindapo, J. O., A. Harrison and O. M. Sanusi. 2014. Evaluation of mechanical properties of coconut shell fibers as reinforcement material in epoxy matrix. Int. J. Eng. Res. Tech., 3 (2): 2337–2348.
  17. Bhakkad, R.L., et al. 2024. Manufacturing and evaluation of jute fiber with gypsum and walnut shell powder composite with epoxy resin. E3S Web Conf., 552: 01086.
  18. Lala, S.D., et al. 2023. A comparative study on mechanical, physico-chemical and thermal properties of rubber and walnut seed shell reinforced epoxy composites and prominent timber species. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 237 (5): 1165–1177.
  19. Kumar, A., J. P. Supale and K. Goyal. 2023. Fabrication and material characterization of composite fiberboard made by walnut’s waste. Evergreen. 10 (4): 2153–2160. DOI: 10.5109/7160890.
  20. Özen, M., et al. 2024. Sustainable bio-filler for epoxy composites: Use of pistachio shell powder. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Univ. J. Sci. Eng., 7 (1):150–165.
  21. Sharma, H., J.P. Misra and I. Singh. 2022. Sustainable composites using fruit waste: An experimental investigation. 3rd International Conference on Advances in materials processing: Challenges and opportunities, Singapore. Proceedings, pp 219–224.
  22. Ethmane, I.A. and A. Yahfdhou. 2020. Effect of almond shell particles on tensile property of particle board. Chem. Mater. Sci. Res. J., 2(2): 51-54.
  23. Gorar, A.A.K., et al. 2023. Green composites from vanillin-based benzoxazine: Modified almond shell particles, curing behaviour, thermal stability, mechanical properties and stress analysis. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 140 (45): e54646.
  24. Martijanti, M., et al. 2023. Comparison of mechanical properties between ash and rice husk reinforced epoxy composites. Dinamika Teknik Mesin. 13(2): 145–156. DOI: 10.29303/dtm.v13i2.649.
  25. Patel, D. K., et al. 2024. Comparative review of mechanical properties of rice straw and rice husk fiber reinforced polymer composite. Key Eng. Mater., 981: 151–164.
  26. Abdullahi, U. 2022. Utilization and mechanical properties of rice husk as useful agrowaste and reinforcement in composites fabrication—A critical review. African J. Eng. Env. Res., 3(2): 2-20.
  27. Singh, K. J., R. Kumar and R. Ramratan. 2020. Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of wheat husk pulp reinforced epoxy composites. Adv. Eng. Forum. 36: 114–125.
  28. Cherkashina, N. I., et al. 2023. Synthesis and characteristics of composite material with a plant-based filler. Chem. Eng., 7(2): 38.
  29. Pramudia, M., M. K. Umami and A. Prihantoko. 2022. Effect of fiber volume fraction on tensile strength and fracture analysis of corn husk reinforced epoxy resin composite. MATEC Web Conf., 372: 02005.
  30. Junior, R. R. R., et al. 2024. Impact evaluation of corn husk reinforced epoxy composites. In Composite materials: Sustainable and eco-friendly materials and application. Ed B. Wisner, et al. Springer Cham. pp 21–31.
  31. Kumar, A., S. Kumar and S. Jindal. 2024. Enhancing composite material fabrication through optimization: Employing fruit peel or shell powder as reinforcements using Taguchi-GRA-PCA methodology. Evergreen. 11(2): 701–712. DOI: 10.5109/7183 345.
  32. Kumar, A., B. Dahiya and D. Grover. 2024. Optimizing agricultural waste powder epoxy composite for enhanced strength using a hybrid Taguchi GRA PCA approach. Evergreen. 11 (2): 713–721. DOI: 10.5109/7183347.
  33. ASTM D638-14. 2014. Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International.
  34. ASTM D790-17. 2017. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM International.
  35. ASTM D256-10. 2018. Standard test methods for determining the Izod pendulum impact strength of plastics. ASTM International.
  36. TriboNet. Vicker hardness calculation, hardness test and formula. Available at : https://www.tribo net.org/calculators/hardness-calculation-vickers-indenter/.
IJEP Logo

Quick Link

Menu

Query Form

    Contact Us

    Indian Journal of Environmental Protection,
    Kalpana Corporation, Kalpana Bhawan,
    N 10/60 H-12, Shyama Nagar
    P.O. Bajardiha, Varanasi – 221106

    Phone Number : +91 8130034876

    Email: kalpanacorp81@gmail.com

    Websites : www.e-ijep.co.in

    Copyright © 2025 Indian Journal of Environmental Protection | Kalpana Corporation