Frequency-specific audiometric profile in individuals with occupational noise-induced hearing loss

IJEP 45(8): 760-765 : Vol. 45 Issue. 8 (August 2025)

Daisy Edwin1*, Madhan Chandrasekhar1 and Sugaraj Samue2

1. Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Faculty of Audiology and Speech, Language Pathology, Chennai – 600 116, Tamil Nadu, India
2. The New College (Affiliated to University of Madras), Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

This study aimed to examine how road traffic noise might affect drivers’ hearing across different frequency ranges, including low, speech and high frequencies. It also looked at how drivers’ age and experience could influence these effects. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 98 healthy professional drivers aged 25-55. Participants were divided into three groups based on age and driving experience. Standard pure tone audiometry and extended high-frequency audiometry (EHFA) were used to test frequencies from 250 Hz to 16 kHz. The study was carried out between July 2021 and August 2022. Results showed that hearing thresholds increased with higher frequency and more driving experience. The data suggested that hearing loss might occur earlier at 4 kHz to 8 kHz than at lower frequencies in conventional audiometry. The differences were more significant in EHFA, especially in groups with longer exposure and higher age. Threshold levels were significantly elevated (p-value <0.05) across all tested frequencies, except for lower frequencies in conventional audiometry. The findings indicate that drivers are particularly at risk for hearing loss after prolonged noise exposure. EHFA can be useful for early detection of increased hearing thresholds at high frequencies. The researchers recommend raising awareness, performing regular hearing tests and educating drivers about the harmful effects of loud traffic noise in urban areas.

Keywords

Auditory health, Education, Exposure, Frequencies, Threshold

References

  1. Georgiadou, E., K. Kourtidis and I. Ziomas. 2004. Exploratory traffic noise measurements at five main streets of Thessaloniki, Greece. Global NEST Int. J., 6(1): 53-61.
  2. The Times Now. 2020. Chennai speaks volumes, bags noisiest city tag beating Delhi. Available at : https://www.timesnownews.com/mirror-now/civic-issues/article/chennai-speaks-volumes-bags-noisiest-city-tag-beating-delhi/554324.
  3. WHO. 2024. Deafness and hearing loss. World Health Organization, Geneva. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss.
  4. Wang, T.C., et al. 2021. Association between exposure to road traffic noise and hearing impairment: A case-control study. J. Env. Health Sci. Eng., 19: 1483-1489
  5. Abbasi, M., B. Pourrajab and M.O. Tokhi. 2021. Protective effects of vitamins/antioxidants on occupational noise-induced hearing loss: a systematic review. J. occupational health. 63(1): e12217.
  6. Gupta, M., et al. 2015. Pattern of noise induced hearing loss and its relation with duration of exposure in traffic police personnel. Indian J. Community Health. 27(2): 276-280.
  7. Singh, R., R.K. Saxena and S. Varshney. 2009. Early detection of noise induced hearing loss by using
    ultra high frequency audiometry. Int. J. Otorhinolar-yngol., 10(2): 1-5.
  8. Rabinowitz, P.M., et al. 2006. Audiogram notches in noise-exposed workers. Ear hearing. 27(6): 742-750.
  9. Le, T.N., et al. 2017. Current insights in noise-induced hearing loss: a literature review of the underlying mechanism, pathophysiology, asymmetry and management options. J. otolaryngol. head neck surgery. 46(1): 41.
  10. Mehrparvar, A.H., et al. 2014. Conventional audiometry, extended high-frequency audiometry and DPOAE for early diagnosis of NIHL. Iranian Red Crescent Medical J., 16(1): e9628.
  11. Olusanya, B.O., A.C. Davis and H.J. Hoffman. 2019. Hearing loss grades and the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Bull. World Health Organization. 97(10): 725.
  12. Wang, D., et al. 2019. Hearing threshold levels and hearing loss among people in Zhejiang, China: A population-based cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 9(4): e027152.
  13. Torre, P., et al. 2015. Hearing loss among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative men and women. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surgery. 141(3): 202-210.
  14. Wei, W., et al. 2017. Audiometric notch and extended high-frequency hearing threshold shift in relation to total leisure noise exposure: An exploratory analysis. Noise Health. 19(91): 263-269.
  15. Patwardhan, M.S., M.M. Kolate and T.A. More. 1991. To assess effect of noise on hearing ability of bus drivers by audiometry. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol., 35(1): 35-38.
  16. Kumar, K. and V.K. Jain. 1994. A study of noise in various modes of transport in Delhi. Appl. Acoustics. 43(1): 57-65.
  17. Anil, H.T. and S. Arunima. 2022. Noise induced hearing loss in auto-rickshaw drivers in Bangalore: a cross- sectional study. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surgery. 2: 1-7.
  18. Škerková, M., et al. 2023. Extended high-frequency audiometry: hearing thresholds in adults. European Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 280(2): 565-572.
  19. Priya, J.S. and M.H. Hohman. 2025. Noise exposure and hearing loss. StatPearls Publishing, Florida.