Implementation of Environment Management System in Manufacturing Industry: Investigating the Challenges and Mechanism to Address Challenges

IJEP 42(1): 102-110 : Vol. 42 Issue. 1 (January 2022)

Veera Kumar Mohan and Gabriel Tonga Noweg*

University Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS), Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Malaysia

Abstract

An environmental management system (EMS) is considered a systematic approach, that is taken by the organization to manage all the issues related to the environment. It includes measuring the performance and taking appropriate action that automatically enhances the value of an organization and is beneficial for both organization and environment. Abu Dhabi is under stress because of rapid urbanization, that is related to land reclamation and construction breakwater. There are several manufacturing units and their activities in Abu Dhabi, UAE that have affected the environment adversely by reducing the quality of air and water and productivity of the ecosystem. As a result, the EMS helps to preserve national resources, such as oil, water to maximize productivity and reduce waste of most resources. Therefore, the present study aims to propose the measures/structure to overcome the challenges of the effective implementation of environmental management system (EMS) by the manufacturing industries in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE. The factors leading towards the adoption of EMS within the manufacturing industries in UAE and evaluating the current status in the implementation of EMS by such manufacturing industries in UAE has been determined. In order to reach this objective, a quantitative research method has been followed that uses 4–point Likert scale based close-ended questionnaires as primary data and journals, articles, books, etc., has been used as secondary data. Simple random sampling method has been used and the questionnaire has been distributed among 475 individuals with different levels, such as management staff and operational staff from the different manufacturing industries in Abu Dhabi, UAE. SPSS analysis has been used for data analysis tools involving Chi-square tests. The results and findings have been illustrated as per the data analyzed in the study. Also, the limitations and conclusions have been represented for the given research.

Keywords

Environmental management system, Environment, Manufacturing industries, Operations, Organizations

References

  1. Raouf, M.A. 2008. Climate change threats, opportunities and the GCC countries. Middle East Institute Policy Brief. 12: 1-17.
  2. Kazim, A.M. 2007. Assessments of primary energy consumption and its environmental consequences in the United Arab Emirates. Renew. Sustain. Energy Reviews. 11(3): 426-446.
  3. Khondaker, A.N., et al. 2016. Greenhouse gas emissions from energy sector in the United Arab Emirates– An overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Reviews. 59: 1317-1325.
  4. Burger, J. 2008. Environmental management: Integrating ecological evaluation, remediation, restoration, natural resource damage assessment and long-term stewardship on contaminated lands. Sci. Total Env., 400(1-3): 6-19.
  5. Qu, Y., et al. 2013. A review of developing an e-wastes collection system in Dalian, China. J. Cleaner Prod., 52: 176-184.
  6. Zhu, Q., J. Sarkis and K.H. Lai. 2007. Initiatives and outcomes of green supply chain management implementation by Chinese manufacturers. J. Env. Manage., 85(1): 179-189.
  7. Kolberg, D. and D. Zühlke. 2015. Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC-Papers Online. 48(3): 1870-1875.
  8. Lu, Y. 2017. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J. Ind. Info. Integration. 6: 1-10.
  9. Stock, T. and G. Seliger. 2016. Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp., 40: 536-541.
  10. Varghese, A. and D. Tandur. 2014. Wireless requirements and challenges in industry 4.0. International Conference on Contemporary computing and informatics (IC3I). IEEE Proceedings, pp 634-638.
  11. Ford, M. 2015. Industry 4.0: Who benefits? SMT Surf. Mt. Tech., 30: 52-55.
  12. Reinhard, G., V. Jesper and S. Stefan. 2016. Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise. 2016 Global Industry 4.0 Survey. 1(1): 1-39.
  13. Lee, I. and K. Lee. 2015. The internet of things (IoT): Applications, investments and challenges for enterprises. Business Horizons. 58(4): 431-440.
  14. Schumacher, A., S. Erol and W. Sihn. 2016. A maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia Cirp., 52(1): 161-166.
  15. Chen, S., et al. 2014. A vision of IoT: Applications, challenges and opportunities with China perspective. IEEE Internet Things J., 1(4): 349-359.
  16. Qian, Z.H. and Y.J. Wang. 2012. IoT technology and application. Acta Electronica Sinica. 5: 26.
  17. Binder, J. 2016. Global project management: Communication, collaboration and management across borders. Routledge. 15-20.
  18. Bayulken, B. and D. Huisingh. 2015. Are lessons from eco-towns helping planners make more effective progress in transforming cities into sustainable urban systems: A literature review (part 2 of 2). J. Cleaner Prod., 109: 152-165.
  19. Sajwani, A. and Y. Nielsen. 2019. The environmental management system framework of the industrial facility: A case study in the UAE aluminium industry. J. Env. Hazard., 2: 116.
  20. Lasrado, F., M.Z. Arif and A.H. Rizvi. 2015. Assessing sustainability of employee suggestion schemes: Cases from the United Arab Emirates. Int. J. Organizational Analysis. 23(3): 425-455.
  21. Idries, A., et al. 2015. Challenges of developing UAV applications: A project management view. International Conference on Industrial engineering and operations management Dubai, United Arab Emirates (UAE).
  22. Hessami, H.Z. and N.S. Nezhad. 2012. Evaluation and ranking of success factors and benefits of ISO 14001- Based EMS implementation using the TOPSIS method. J. Appl. Env. Biol. Sci., 2(8): 419-427.
  23. Deepak, B., N.R. Bishnoi and S. Mona. 2015. Challenges and benefits of implementing an environmental management system: A review. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technical Res., 5(2): 159-180.
  24. Prajogo, D., et al. 2016. Environmental audits and third party certification of management practices: Firms motives, audit orientations and satisfaction with certification. Int. J. Auditing. 20(2): 202-210.
  25. Ozusaglam, S., E. Kesidou and C.Y. Wong. 2018. Performance effects of complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental technologies. Int. J. Prod. Eco., 197: 112-122.
  26. Sajwani, A. 2017. Enhancing the application of the environmental management system (EMS) in the UAE aluminium industry. Doctoral dissertation. Heriot-Watt University.
  27. Dereinda, F. and L. Greenwood. 2015. Environmental management system risks and opportunities: A case study in Pertamina geothermal energy area Kamojang. Env. Manage., 19: 25.
  28. Al Damkhi, A.M., et al. 2008. Developing environmental impact statement (EIS) guidelines for the management of environmental quality at major projects in Kuwait. Manag. Env. Quality Int. J., 19(6):670-689.
  29. Sajwani, A. and Y. Nielsen. 2017. The application of the environmental management system at the aluminum industry in UAE. Int. J. Geomate. 12(30): 1-10.
  30. Kumara, K.M.S.C. and T.K. Weerasinghe. 2017. The effectiveness of implementing environmental management system- ISO 14001 in food manufacturing companies: A case study of a Sri Lankan food manufacturing company. Env. Manage. Sustain. Develop., 6(2): 240-249.
  31. Ozusaglam, S., E. Kesidou and C.Y. Wong. 2018. Performance effects of complementarity between environmental management systems and environmental technologies. Int. J. Prod. Eco., 197: 112-122.
  32. Hillary, R. 2004. Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J. Cleaner Prod., 12(6): 561-569.
  33. Global Development Solutions, LLC. 2017. The greening of the urban and industrial transformation agenda project.
  34. Iatridis, K. and E. Kesidou. 2018. What drives substantive versus symbolic implementation of ISO 14001 in a time of economic crisis? Insights from Greek manufacturing companies. J. Business Ethics. 148(4): 859-877.
  35. Gargano, R. 2017. Motivation, expectations and benefits of the introduction and maintenance of the voluntary environmental labels in the tourism sector: A study of Italian companies. Int. J. Adv. Res., 5(12): 723-731.