Stabilization of Expansive Soil Using Terrafirma with Layers of Non-Woven Geotextile for Evaluation of Pavement Construction

IJEP 42(13): 1555-1563 : Vol. 42 Issue. 13 (Conference 2022)

Dharmendra Singh*, Vijay Kumar and R.P. Tiwari

Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Department of Civil Engineering, Prayagraj- 211 004, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

Expansive soils are known worldwide for their volume change behaviour due to variations in the water content. Expansive soils contain clayey minerals such as montmorillonite, which increase in volume during wetting and decrease in volume during drying. As a result, it is one of the most problematic kinds of soil, causing significant annual income losses by destroying roads, pipelines and buildings worldwide every year. This study examines the effect of varying Terrafirma content and the effect of varying Terrafirma content on the strength of black cotton soil. The strength of clayey soil can be altered by the addition of Terrafirma. In this article, attempts are made to describe the effect of Terrafirma on the impact strength of expansive soils, when mixed with such soils. Stabilizer like Terrafirma has a wide range of response spectrum. A wide range of laboratory tests, such as the Atterberg limit test, free swell index (FSI) test, compaction test, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test, California bearing ratio (CBR) test and expansion ratio measures are performed on expansive soil sample with an increasing percentage of Terrafirma between 2-8%. Test results indicate that the inclusion of Terrafirma mixture, not only reduces the plasticity of soil but also increases its unconfined compression strength, maximum dry density and other strength characteristics. The test results indicated a decrease in MDD, specific gravity and UCS as the percentage of Terrafirma in a mix increased. Further, with the increase in the curing period from 0, 4, 7, 14, 28, 56 and 90 days, there was an improvement in UCS value. Further, with the increase in the curing period from 7, 14 and 28 days with 4 days soaking, there was an improvement in CBR value. The swelling was determined in CBR soaking tank by the expansion ratio of the treated soil after 7, 14 and 28 days of curing. Moreover, increasing CBR amount under the influence of increasing Terrafirma is one of the main results of this paper. This study includes the chemical analysis of expansive soils using x-ray diffraction (XRD) and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) before and after the stabilization using Terrafirma in order to evaluate the geotechnical properties.

Keywords

Black cotton soil, Terrafirma, California bearing ratio, Field emission scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction

References

  1. Sharma, A.K. and P.V. Sivapullaiah. 2016. Ground granulated blast furnace slag amended fly ash as an expansive soil stabilizer. Soils Found., 205-212. DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.004
  2. Chenarboni, H.A., et al. 2021. The effect of zeolite and cement stabilization on the mechanical behaviour of expansive soils. Const. Building Mater., 272(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat. 2020.121630
  3. Salahudeen, A.B., A.O. Eberemu and K.J. Osinubi. 2014. Assessment of cement kiln dust-treated expansive soil for the construction of flexible pavements. Geotech. Geol. Eng., 32: 923-931. DOI: 10.1007/s10706-014-9769-0
  4. Rashid, G.M.H.O., M.F. Rahman and A.B. Siddique. 2019. A comparative study on fly ash and bagasse ash using as a sub-grade material. American J. Civil Eng., 7(4):82-87. DOI: 10.11648/j.ajce.20190704. 11
  5. Sabat, A.K. 2012. Utilization of bagasse ash and lime sludge for construction of flexible pavements in expansive soil areas. E. J. Geotech. Eng., 17: 1037-1046.
  6. Phanikumar, B.R. 2009. Effect of lime and fly ash on swell, consolidation and shear strength characteristics of expansive clays: A comparative study. Geomech. Geoeng. Int. J., 4(2): 175-181. DOI: 10.1080=17486020902856983
  7. Sahoo, J.P. and P.K. Pradhan. 2010. Effect of lime stabilized soil cushion on strength behaviour of expansive soil. Geotech. Geol. Eng., 28: 889-897. DOI: 10.1007/s10706-010-9332-6
  8. Sabat, A.K. and P.R. Nanda. 2011. Effect of marble dust on strength and durability of rice husk ash stabilized expansive soil. Int. J. Civil Struc. Eng., 1(4):939-948.
  9. Estabragh, A.R., H. Rafatjo and A.A. Javadi. 2014. Treatment of an expansive soil by mechanical and chemical techniques. Geosyn. Int., 21(3):233-243.
  10. Rashid, G.M.H.O., M.F. Rahman and A.B. Siddique. 2020. A comparative study on fly ash, bagasse ash and rice husk ash using as a sub-grade material in expansive soil. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Civil engineering for sustainable development (ICCESD 2020). KUET, Khulna, Bangladesh,
  11. Sharo, A.A., et al. 2022. Effect of alkali-resistant glass fibers and cement on the geotechnical properties of highly expansive soil, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 34(2): 04021417. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004058
  12. Bhujbal, P. and A.B. Gaikwad. 2022. Quantitative study of shrinkage and crack development in black cotton soil. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Contents, computing and communication (ICCCC-2022). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4043364
  13. Wubshet, M. and S. Tadesse. 2014. Stabilization of expansive soil using bagasse ash and lime. J. EEA. 32:21-26.
  14. Garg, R., et al. 2021. Stabilization of expansive soil by using industrial waste. J. Physics Conf. Series. 2070:012238. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/2070/1/012238.
  15. Ahmed, N.A.K., R.M. Damgir and S.L. Hake. 2014. Effect of fly ash and RBI grade 81 on black cotton soil as a subgrade for flexible pavements. Int. J. Innov. Eng. Tech., 4(1):124-130.
  16. Murmu, A.L., A. Jain and A. Patel. 2019. Mechanical properties of alkali activated fly ash geopolymer stabilized expansive clay. Korean Soc. Civil Engineers J. Civil Eng., 23:3875–3888. DOI: 10.1007/s12205-019-2251-z
  17. Naseem, A., et al. 2019. Stabilization of expansive soil using tire rubber powder and cement kiln dust. Soil Mech. Found. Eng., 56(1):54-58. DOI: 10.1007/s11204-019-09569-8.
  18. Choobbasti, A.J., et al. 2010. Influence of using rice husk ash in soil stabilization method with lime. Front. Earth Sci. China. 4(4): 471-480. DOI: 10.1007/s11707-010-0138-x.
  19. Estabragh, A.R., et al. 2012. Stabilised expansive soil behaviour during wetting and drying. Int. J. Pavement Eng., 14(4): 418-427. DOI: 10.1080/102 98436.2012.746688
  20. Mathew, A. and K.Y. Raneesh. 2016. Effect on strength characteristics of expansive soil using sisal fibre and waste materials. Int. J. Sci. Res., 5(9): 1702-1707.
  21. Irshayyid, E.J. and M.Y. Fattah. 2019. The performance of shear strength and volume changes of expansive soils utilizing different additives. IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng., 518:022043. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/518/2/022043.
  22. Dang, L.C., et al. 2016. Enhancing the engineering properties of expansive soil using bagasse ash and hydrated lime. Int. J. GEOMATE. 11(25): 2447-2454.
  23. Amena, S. and D. Chakeri. 2022. A study on the effects of plastic waste strips and lime on strength characteristics of expansive soil. Adv. Civil Eng., 2022:6952525. DOI: 10.1155/2022/69525 25.
  24. Soganci, A.S. 2015. The effect of polypropylene fiber in the stabilization of expansive soils. World Acad. Sci. Eng. Tech. Int. J. Geol. Env. Eng., 9(8): 994-997.
  25. Syed, M., S. Agarwal and A. GuhaRay. 2019. Stabilization of expansive black cotton soil using alkali-activated binder with glass and polypropylene fiber. Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019: Lecture notes in civil engineering. pp 127-139. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-33-6444-8_11.
  26. Sathya Priya, C.M., et al. 2017. Stabilization of clayey soil using polypropylene fiber. Int. Res. J. Eng. Tech., 4(4):1252-1255.
  27. Gowtham, S., et al. 2018. Stabilization of clay soil by using glass and plastic waste powder. Int. J. Eng. Tech., 4(2):146-150.
  28. Kodicherla, S.P.K. and D.K. Nandyala. 2017. Effect of RBI grade 81 on strength characteristics of clayey subgrade. Int. J. Geoeng., 8:24. DOI: 10.1186/s40703-017-0061-z.
  29. Baruah, H. 2015. Effect of glass fibers on red soil. Int. J. Adv. Tech. Eng. Sci., 3(1):217-223.
  30. Maurya, S., et al. 2015. Review on stabilization of soil using coir fiber. Int. J. Eng. Res., 4(6): 296-299.
  31. Ruan, B., et al. 2020. Analysis on the triaxial shear behavior and microstructure of cement-stabilized clay reinforced with glass fibers. Adv. Civil Eng., 2020:8842091. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8842091.
  32. Wang, Y.X., et al. 2017. Laboratory investigation on strength characteristics of expansive soil treated with jute fiber reinforcement. Int. J. Geomech., 17(11). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943 -5622.0000998.
  33. Audu, M.T., D. N. Mbaezue and S. Dauda. 2019. The engineering characteristics of black cotton soil treated with corn straw ash. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Develop., 6(10):74-80.
  34. Thirumalai, R., et al. 2017. A review on stabilization of expansive soil using industrial solid wastes. Eng., 9:1008-1017. DOI: 10.4236/eng.2017.912 060.
  35. Chen, W., et al. 2022. The effect of length and content of fiber on glass fiber and basalt fiber- Reinforced granite residual soil. Adv. Civil Eng., DOI: 10.1155/2022/7803002.
  36. Kharade, A.S., et al. 2014. Waste product ‘bagasse ash’ from sugar industry can be used as stabilizing material for expansive soils. Int. J. Res. Eng. Tech., 3(3):506-512.
  37. Al-Rawas, A.A. 2002. Microfabric and mineralogical studies on the stabilization of an expansive soil using cement bypass dust and some types of slags. Canadian Geotech. J., 39: 1150-1167. DOI: 10.11 39/T02-046.
  38. Phanikumar, B.R. and T.V. Nagaraju. 2018. Effect of fly ash and rice husk ash on index and engineering properties of expansive clays. Geotech. Geol. Eng., 36:3425-3436. DOI: 10.1007/s10706-018-0544-5.
  39. Phanikumar, B.R. 2009. Effect of lime and fly ash on swell consolidation and shear strength characteristics of expansive clays: A comparative study. Geomech. Geoeng. Int. J., 4(2):175-181. DOI: 10.1080=17486020902856983.
  40. IS 2720-3-2. 1980. Methods of test for soils. Part 3: Determination of specific gravity. Section 2: Fine, medium and coarse grained soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  41. IS 2720-2. 1973. Methods of test for soils. Part 2: Determination of water content. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  42. IS 2720-40. 1977. Methods of test for soils. Part 40: Determination of free swell index of soils. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  43. IS 2720-5. 1985. Methods of test for soils. Part 5: Determination of liquid and plastic limit. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  44. IS 2720-6. 1972. Methods of test for soils. Part 6: Determination of shrinkage factors. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  45. IS 1498. 1970. Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  46. IS 2720-7. 1980. Methods of test for soils. Part 7: Determination of water content-dry density relation using light compaction. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  47. IS 2720-10. 1991. Methods of test for soils. Part 10: Determination of unconfined compressive strength. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  48. IS 2720-16. 1987. Methods of test for soils. Part 16: Laboratory determination of CBR. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.
  49. IS 2720-4. 1985. Methods of test for soils. Part 4: Grain size analysis. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.soils: Part 7 determination of optimum moisture content-maximum dry density relation using light compaction.