Influence of Solid Activator on Setting Time and Compressive Strength Properties of Fly Ash/Slag-Based One-Part Geopolymer Pastes

IJEP 42(13): 1578-1583 : Vol. 42 Issue. 13 (Conference 2022)

Anil S. Srinivasa*, K. Swaminathan and S.C. Yaragal

National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Department of Civil Engineering, Surathkal- 575 025, Mangalore, India

Abstract

Geopolymerization has transformed industrial wastes into strong and durable construction materials such as geopolymer binders to minimise CO2 emissions during ordinary Portland cement (OPC) production. These geopolymer binders, on the other hand, are derived from aluminosilicate waste products and alkali activators. The activator solutions show some drawbacks in transportation, storage, preparation and execution stage. In this research, a new one-part or just-add water geopolymer binder was developed by dry blending the aluminosilicate precursors, alkali activators in powder form and free water, similar to OPC. The impact of solid activator on the fly ash/slag based OPG mixes with respect to setting time and compressive properties was studied. The solid activator content was considered from 6 to 16% at an interval of 2%. Microstructure and mineral phase evolution of the mixtures were investigated using scanning electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction. The test results revealed that prolonged setting times were recorded at lower activator content. The lower compressive strength was recorded at 6% activator and higher strength was noticed at 12% activator content. The mix with 12% activator performed better than all other mixes with respect to setting time and compressive strength properties and also exhibits dense and compacted microstructure properties.

Keywords

Geopolymer binders, OPC, OPG, X-ray diffraction

References

  1. Turner, L.K. and F.G. Collins. 2013. Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: A comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr. Build. Mater., 43: 125-130
  2. Pacheco-Torgal, F., J. Castro-Gomes and S. Jalali. 2008. Alkali-activated binders: A review. Part 1: Historical background, terminology, reaction mechanisms and hydration products. Constr. Build. Mater., 22: 1305-1314.
  3. Lee, N.K. and H.K. Lee. 2013. Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature. Constr. Build. Mater., 47: 1201-1209
  4. Alonso, M.M., et al. 2017. Alkali-activated mortars: Workability and rheological behaviour. Constr. Build. Mater., 145: 576-587
  5. Yaragal, S., B. C. Kumar and M.U. Abhinav. 2019. Numerical and experimental studies on sustainable alkali activated concretes at elevated temperatures. J. Struct. Fire Eng., 02: 14.
  6. Duxson, P. and J.L. Provis. 2008. Designing precursors for geopolymer cements. J. American Ceramic Soc., 91: 3864-3869.
  7. Duxson, P., et al. 2007. Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. J. Mater. Sci., 42: 2917-2933.
  8. Elzeadani, M., D.V. Bompa and A.Y. Elghazouli. 2022. One part alkali activated materials: A state-of-the-art review. J. Build. Eng., 57: 104871.
  9. Oderji, S.Y., et al. 2019. Fresh and hardened properties of one-part fly ash-based geopolymer binders cured at room temperature: Effect of slag and alkali activators. J. Clean. Prod., 225: 1-10.
  10. Ma, C., et al. 2019. Properties and characterization of green one-part geopolymer activated by composite activators. J. Clean. Prod., 220: 188-199.
  11. Dong, M., M. Elchalakani and A. Karrech. 2020. Development of high strength one-part geopolymer mortar using sodium metasilicate. Constr. Build. Mater., 236: 117611.
  12. Oderji, S.Y., et al. 2019. Influence of superplas-ticizers and retarders on the workability and strength of one-part alkali-activated fly ash/slag binders cured at room temperature. Constr. Build. Mater., 229: 116891.
  13. ASTM C618-22. 2023. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States.
  14. ASTM C989/C989M-18a. 2022. Standard specification for slag cement for use in concrete and mortars. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States.
  15. ASTM C191-21. 2021. Standard test methods for time of setting of hydraulic cement by vicat needle. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States.
  16. ASTM C109/C109M-20. 2020. Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2 inch or 50 mm cube specimens). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States.
  17. Li, L., et al., 2020. Rheology behavior of one-part alkali activated slag/glass powder (AASG) pastes. Constr. Build. Mater., 258: 120381.
  18. Haruna, S., et al. 2021. Long-term strength development of fly ash-based one-part alkali-activated binders. Mater., 14(15):4160.
  19. Luukkonen, T., et al. 2018. Comparison of alkali and silica sources in one-part alkali-activated blast furnace slag mortar. J. Clean. Prod., 187: 171-179.