Box-Behnken Model to Optimize Media Layer in Hybrid Constructed Wetland for Municipal Wastewater Treatment

IJEP 42(13): 1641-1646 : Vol. 42 Issue. 13 (Conference 2022)

K.K. Singh* and R.C. Vaishya

Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Department of Civil Engineering, Prayagraj – 211 004, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

In developing nations, constructed wetland approaches for municipal wastewater treatment have expanded modestly. This necessitates research into the use of cold drink plastic bottle chips (CDPBC) media as an alternate natural media layer approach in hybrid constructed wetlands (HCW). This part examined the use of bottle chip media in the HCW operational mechanism for wastewater treatment. To optimise the chip medium thickness conditions, response surface methodology (RSM) based on a Box-Behnken design (BBD) was applied. The removal efficiency of total suspended solids (TSS), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD3) was investigated using 29 experimental results run by BBD for four operational parameters- CDPBC media layer (10-25 mm), flow rate (40-74.48 L/day), hydraulic loading rate (HLR) (0.409-0.761 m/day) and mixing rate (15-25 rpm). The acquired data were analysed using ANOVA and a quadratic model as a function of operational parameters, with a significant regression coefficient (R2>0.966) at a 95% confidence level. TSS (87.92%), COD (88.77%) and BOD3 (92.38%) were achieved with one out of 100 distinct solutions with numerically optimised CDPBC media layer (6.05 mm), flow rate (72.45 L/day), HLR (0.54 m/day) and mixing rate (21.33 rpm) parameters. The best scenario was confirmed, revealing that modifying the medium layer, flow rate and HLR may enhance removal efficiency. The research suggests that the CDPBC media layer in HCW might be employed as a viable natural media in municipal wastewater treatment in the future.

Keywords

Hybrid constructed wetland, CDPBC media, Response surface methodology, Box Behnken design, Municipal wastewater

References

  1. Desta, W.M. and M.E. Bote. 2021. Wastewater treatment using a natural coagulant (Moringa oleifera seeds): Optimization through response surface methodology. Heliyon. 7(11):e08451. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08451.
  2. Al-Falahi, O.A., et al. 2021. Simultaneous removal of ibuprofen, organic material and nutrients from domestic wastewater through a pilot-scale vertical sub-surface flow constructed wetland with aeration system. J. Water Process Eng., 43(6): 102214. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102214.
  3. Wang, Y., et al. 2014. Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for papermaking-reconstituted tobacco slice wastewater treatment using response surface methodology. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(2):391-396. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.04.033.
  4. Maurya, S. and A. Daverey. 2018. Evaluation of plant-based natural coagulants for municipal wastewater treatment. 3 Biotech., 8(1):1-4. DOI: 10.10 07/s13205-018-1103-8.
  5. Ugwu, S.N., et al. 2017. Comparative study of the use of natural and artificial coagulants for the treatment of sullage (domestic wastewater). Cogent Eng., 4(1). DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2017.1365 676.
  6. Saeed, T., et al. 2018. Industrial wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands packed with construction materials and agricultural by-products. J. Clean. Prod., 189:442-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro. 2018.04.115.
  7. Stefanakis, A.I. and V.A. Tsihrintzis. 2012. Effects of loading, resting period, temperature, porous media, vegetation and aeration on performance of pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands. Chem. Eng. J., 181-182:416-430. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.20 11.11.108.
  8. Pang, Y., et al. 2015. Cold temperature effects on long-term nitrogen transformation pathway in a tidal flow constructed wetland. Env. Sci. Tech., 49(22): 13550-13557. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04002.
  9. Yang, X., et al. 2020. Nanoplastics disturb nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands: Responses of microbes and macrophytes. Env. Sci. Tech., 54(21):14007-14016. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c 03324.
  10. Adeogun, A.I., P.B. Bhagawati and C.B. Shivayogimath. 2021. Pollutants removals and energy consumption in electrochemical cell for pulping processes wastewater treatment: Artificial neural network, response surface methodology and kinetic studies. J. Env. Manage., 281(8):111897. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111897.
  11. Tetteh, E.K. and S. Rathilal. 2021. Application of magnetized nanomaterial for textile effluent remediation using response surface methodology. Mater. Today Proc., 38:700-711. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.827.
  12. Selamat, S.N., et al. 2018. Optimization of lead (Pb) bioaccumulation in Melastoma malabathricum L. by response surface methodology (RSM). Rend. Lincei. 29(1):43-51. DOI: 10.1007/s12210-017-0656-5.
  13. Naik, S.S. and Y.P. Setty. 2014. Optimization of parameters using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm for biological denitrification of wastewater. Int. J. Env. Sci. Tech., 11(3):823-830. DOI: 10.1007/s13762-013-0266-4.