Transformative Changes Lensing Nuclear and Renewable Energy in Reducing Carbon Footprint: Re-defining Sustainability and Legal Frameworks for Environmental Protection Positioning SDG 15- Life on Land

IJEP 44(11): 999-1009 : Vol. 44 Issue. 11 (November 2024)

Bhupinder Singh1* and Christian Kaunert2,3

1. Sharda University, Sharda School of Law, Greater Noida – 201 310, Uttar Pradesh, India
2. Dublin City University, International Security, Dublin 9, Ireland
3. University of South Wales, International Centre for Policing and Security, Policing and Security, United Kingdom

Abstract

The global imperative to mitigate climate change and its ecological repercussions has ignited an urgent need for transformative changes in the energy sector. By scrutinizing the intricate interplay between energy systems, environmental protection and sustainable development goal (SDG) 15 – ‘life on land,’ this study seeks to uncover the synergies and complexities at the crossroads of energy policy and ecological preservation. The critical examination of nuclear energy reveals its potential to generate substantial power with minimal greenhouse gas emissions. While addressing concerns over waste disposal and safety, advanced nuclear technologies offer a viable alternative to fossil fuels. In parallel, renewable energy sources, like solar, wind and hydroelectric power epitomize sustainable energy production. Their decentralization and minimal ecological impact position them as catalysts for achieving SDG 15, fostering biodiversity, combating desertification and conserving terrestrial ecosystems. The paper is divided into the legal frameworks that underpin environmental protection and sustainability. It navigates the intricate tapestry of international agreements, national regulations and evolving jurisprudence that shape energy transitions. The convergence of energy policy, climate action and biodiversity preservation calls for comprehensive legal architectures harmonizing diverse interests while safeguarding ecosystems for present and future generations. The juxtaposition of nuclear and renewable energy sources underscores the need for an integrated energy approach that leverages their respective strengths while mitigating inherent challenges. Policy recommendations are formulated to establish a holistic energy matrix that balances reliability, affordability and environmental stewardship. The pursuit of mitigating climate change and advancing environmental sustainability has brought about an imperative for transformative changes within the energy sector. This paper delves into the pivotal role of nuclear and renewable energy sources in the context of reducing carbon footprint, redefining sustainability paradigms and establishing legal frameworks for environmental protection. Specifically, the study explores the intricate dynamics at the intersection of energy policy, ecological preservation and the sustainable development goal (SDG) 15, which focuses on preserving and restoring terrestrial ecosystems (life on land).

Keywords

Transformative changes, Nuclear and renewable energy, Sustainability, Sustainable development goal 15, Legal framework, Carbon footprint, Environment protection

References

  1. Fu, Q., et al. 2021. Impact of renewable energy on economic growth and CO2emissions- Evidence from BRICS countries. Process. 9(8): 1281.
  2. Ali, S., et al. 2022. Revolution of nuclear energy efficiency, economic complexity, air transportation and industrial improvement on environment foot- print cost: A novel dynamic simulation approach. Nuclear Eng. Tech., 54(10): 3682-3694.
  3. Taylor, M. 2020. Energy subsidies evolution in the global energy transformation to 2050. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.
  4. Imran, M., et al. 2023. Does nuclear energy reduce carbon emissions despite using fuels and chemicals? Transition to clean energy and finance for green solutions. Geosci. Frontiers. 15(4): 101608.
  5. Yuan, X., et al. 2022. The race to zero emissions: Can renewable energy to be path to carbon neurality? J. Env. Manage., 308: 114648.
  6. Ahmed, Z., et al. 2022. Effects of economic complexity, economic growth and renewable energy technology budgets on ecological footprint: The role of democratic accountability. Env. Sci. Poll. Res., 29(17): 24925-24940.
  7. Pyka, I. and A. Nocon. 2021. Responsible lending policy of green investments in the energy sector in Poland. Energies. 14(21): 7298.
  8. Pegels, A. 2010. Renewable energy in South Africa: Potentials, barriers and options for support. Energy Policy. 38(9): 4945-4954.
  9. Singh, B. 2023. Blockchain technology in renovating health-care: Legal and future perspectives. In Revolutionizing health care through artifical intelligence and internet applications. IGI Global. pp 177-186.
  10. Zhang, D., Y. Wang and X. Peng. 2023. Carbon emissions and clean energy investment: Global evidence. Emerging Markets Finance Trade. 59(2): 312-323.
  11. Wang, X., et al. 2010. Winds of change: East Asia’s sustainable energy future. World Bank Publications.
  12. Mazzucato, M. 2015. The green entrepreneurial state. In Politics Green Transformations. pp 134-152. DOI: 10.4324/9781315747378-9.
  13. Du, J., et al. 2023. The role of green financing in facilitating renewable energy transition in China: Perspectives from energy governance, environmental regulation and market reforms. Energy Eco., 120: 106595.
  14. Newell, P. and D. Mulvaney. 2013. The political economy of the just transition. Geogr. J., 179(2): 132-140.
  15. Singh, B. 2023. Federated learning for envision future trajectory smart transport system for climate preservation and smart green planet: Insights into global governance and SDG-9 (industry innovation and infrastructure). National J. Env. Law. 6(2): 6-17.
  16. Saliba, C.B., et al. 2022. The dynamic impact of renewable energy and economic growth on CO2 emissions in China: Do remittances and technological innovations matter? Sustain., 14(21): 14629.
  17. Busch, J., T.J. Foxon and P.G. Taylor. 2018. Designing industrial strategy for a low carbon transformation. Env. Innovation Societal Transitions. 29: 114-125.
  18. Kadaba, D.M.K., P.S. Aithal and K.R.S. Sharma. 2022. Impact of sustainable finance on MSMEs and other companies to promote green growth and sustainable development. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Manage. Letters. 6(1): 60-76.
  19. Dent, C.M. 2014. Renewable energy in East Asia: Towards a new developmentalism. Routledge.
  20. Li, D., et al. 2023. Spatial and temporal evolution patterns of material, energy and carbon emission nexus for power generation infrastructure in China. Resour. Conser., Recycling. 190: 106775.
  21. Antonakalkis, N., I. Chatiziantoniou and G. Filis. 2017. Energy consumption, CO2emissions and economic growth: An ethical dilemma. Renew Sustain. Energy Reviews. 68: 808-824.
  22. Okereke, C., B. Wittneben and F. Bowen. 2012. Climate change: Challenging business, transforming politics. Business Soc., 51(1): 7-30.
  23. Newell, P. and M. Peterson. 2010. Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Chirtoe, I.E., G. Busan and N. Ecobici. 2020. The importance of supporting investment in renewable energy. Annals Eco. Series. 5: 145-150.
  25. Sayer, J., et al. 2019. SDG 15-Life on land- The central role of forests in sustainable development. In Sustainable development goals: Their impacts on forest and people. Cambridge University Press. pp 482-509.
  26. Klein, M. 2020. SDG 15: Life on land. Jean monnet sustainable development goals network policy brief series. RMIT University Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  27. Wang, T., et al. 2020. Supporting SDG 15-Life on land: Identifying the main drivers of land degradation in Honghe Prefecture, China, between 2005 and 2015. ISPRS Int. J. Geo. Inf., 9(12): 710.
  28. Krauss, J.E. 2021. Decolonizing, conviviality
    and convivial conservation: Towards a convivial SDG15-Life on land? J. Political Ecol., 28(1): 945–967.
  29. Ansari, N.A., C. Agus and E.K. Nunoo. 2021. SDG 15-Life on land: Towards effective biodiversity management. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  30. Krauss, J.E. 2022. Unpacking SDG 15, its targets and indicators: Tracing ideas of conservation. Globializations. 19(8): 1179-1194.
  31. Andrew, D. 2017. Trade and sustainable development goal (SDG) 15: Promoting ‘life on land’ through mandatory and voluntary approaches. ADBI working paper no. 700. Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo.
  32. Wei, F., et al. 2021. Ecological civilization: China’s effort to build a shared future for all life on earth. National Sci. Review. 8(7): 279.
  33. Filho, W.L., et al. 2022. An overview of the interactions between food production and climate change. Sci. Total Env., 838: 156438.
  34. Singh, B. 2019. Profiling public healthcare: A comparative analysis based on the multidimensional health care management and legal approach. Indian J. Health Medical Law. 2(2): 1-5.
  35. Bradford, T. 2008. Solar revolution: The economic transformation of the global energy industy. MIT Press.
  36. Beckmann, V. 2021. Transitioning to sustainable life on land. In Introduction to SDG 15 and the sutainable life on land (vol 1). MDPI.
  37. Singh, B. 2024. Legal dynamics lensing metaverse crafted for videogame industry and e-sports: Phenomenological exploration catalyst complexity and future. J. Intellectual Property Rights Law. 7(1): 8-14.
  38. Sharma, A. and B. Singh. 2022. Measuring impact of e-commerce on small scale business: A systematic review. J. Corporate Governance Int. Business Law. 5(1).
  39. Singh, B. 2022. Understanding legal frameworks concerning transgender health care in the age of dynamism. E. J. Social Strategic Studies. 3: 56-65.
  40. Newell, P., J. Phillips and D.R. Mulvaney. 2011. Pursuing clean energy equitably. Occasional papers 2011/03. Human Development Research Paper, UNDP.
  41. Singh, B. 2022. Relevance of agriculture-nutrition linkage for human healthcare: A conceptual legal framework of implication and pathways. Justice Law Bulletin. 1(1): 44-49.
  42. Singh, B. 2022. Covid-19 pandemic and public halthcare: Endless downyard spiral or solution via rapid legal and health services implementation with patient monitoring programme. Justice Law Bulletin. 1(1): 1-7.
  43. Singh, B. 2020. Global science and jurisprudential approach concerning healthcare and illness. Indian J. Health Medical Law. 3(1): 7-13.