Assessing the Implementation of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices: Key Findings and Policy Strategies

IJEP 45(6): 527-538 : Vol. 45 Issue. 6 (June 2025)

Shristi Dass and U.R. Rajeshwari*

CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Department of Economics, Bangalore – 560 029, Karnataka, India

Abstract

Climate change poses a significant threat to global agriculture, jeopardizing food security and the livelihoods of millions. The agricultural sector’s vulnerability is evident in altered precipitation patterns, rising temperatures and an increase in extreme weather events. This study examines climate smart agriculture (CSA) as an adaptive approach to boost productivity, enhance resilience and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Focusing on Chhattisgarh, India —a region reliant on rain-fed agriculture —this research assesses farmers’ attitudes toward climate change and CSA adoption, identifying both challenges and opportunities. The findings reveal a mixed adoption of CSA practices, with preferences for water-smart, knowledge-smart and weather-smart technologies. Key barriers include economic constraints, insufficient awareness and limited government support. However, a high adoption rate (72.5%) of knowledge-smart practices, such as improved seed varieties, underscores the importance of agricultural institutions and information dissemination. The study recommends enhancing support for energy and carbon-smart technologies, improving access to agricultural insurance and bolstering knowledge-sharing initiatives. These insights offer valuable guidance for policymakers, agricultural extension services and farmers in promoting climate-resilient and sustainability in Chhattisgarh.  

Keywords

Climate change, Climate smart agriculture, Climate-smart technologies, Adaptation, Implementation of climate smart agriculture

References

  1. IPCC. 2014. AR5 climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Part A: Global and sectoral aspects. Summary for policymakers. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. pp 1-32.
  2. IPCC. 2022. Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Summary for policymakers. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. pp 3-33. DOI: 10.1017/9781009325844.001.
  3. Porter, J.R., et al. 2014. Food security and food production systems. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  4. Schmidhuber, J. and F.N. Tubiello. 2007. Global food security under climate change. Proceedings National Academy Sci., 104(50): 19703-19708.
  5. Lipper, L., et al. 2014. Climate smart agriculture for food security. Nature Climate Change. 4: 1068-1072.
  6. Palombi, L. and R. Sessa. 2013. Climate-smart agri-culture: Sourcebook. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.
  7. Cambell, B.M., et al. 2016. Sustainable intensification: What is its role in climate smart agriculture? Curr. Opinion Env. Sustain., 8: 39-43.
  8. Aggarwal, P.K., et al. 2018. The climate smart village approach: Framework of an integrative strategy for scaling-up adaptation opinions in agriculture. Ecol. Soc., 23(1): 14.
  9. Aggarwal, P.K. 2008. Global climate change and Indian agriculture: Impacts, adaptation and mitigation. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 78(10): 911-919.
  10. Singh, M. and F.Q. Hasan. 2023. Climate smart agriculture practices in India. EAI Endorsed Transactions Energy Web. 10(2023). DOI: 10.4108/ew. 4645.
  11. Shrivastava, S.C. and O.L. Shrivastava. 2019. Impact of climate change on agriculture in Chhattis-garh. Mind Soc., 8(3-4): 20-27.
  12. Zacharias, M., et al. 2009. Assessment of impacts of climate change on rice and wheat in the Indo-Gangetic plains. J. Agrometeor., 16(1): 9–17.
  13. Samra, J.A. 2004. Heatwave of March 2004: Impact on agriculture. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
  14. Ndjeunga, J. and M.S.C. Bantilan. 2005. Uptake of improved technologies in the semi and tropics of West Africa: Why is agricultural transformation lagging behind? J. Agric. Develop., 2(1): 85-201.
  15. Quisumbing, A.R. and L. Pandolfelli. 2010. Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints and interventions. World Develop., 18(4): 581-592.
  16. Hounkonnou, D., et al. 2012. An innovation systems approach in institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa. Agric. Systems. 108: 74-83.
  17. Finger, R. and S. Schmid. 2007. Modelling agricultural production risk and the adaptation to climate change. Agric. Finance Review. 68(1): 25-41.
  18. Khatri-Chatri, A., et al. 2016. Economic benefits of climate-smart agricultural practices to smallholder farmers in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Curr. Sci., 110(7): 1251-1256.
  19. Singh, B.P., et al. 2020. Crop residue management for improving soil carbon storage, nutrient availability and fertilizer use efficiency. In Soil and fertilizers (1st edn). CRC Press.
  20. NITI Aayog. 2021. Natural farming: Chhattisgarh. Available at: https://naturalfarming.niti.gov.in/ chhattisgarh/.