Production Of Compost Using Eichhornia crassipes And Its Nutritive Analysis

IJEP 41(3): 282-286 : Vol. 41 Issue. 3 (March 2021)

Sangilimuthu Alagar Yadav, Sumayya Rehaman*, Kalaiselvi A. and Rajiv P.

Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Department of Biotechnology, Coimbatore – 641 021, India


The aquatic weed of monster invasive nature is Eichhornia crassipes (mart) with massively grown in tonnes and occupies various lakes. It takes up the nutrients of the lake water and destroys the habitat environment for the fauna and other flora. To reduce the weed with an alternative method, they were collected, shredded and mixed up with the vegetable waste (4:1) and subjected to composting. After 68 days of composting, the matured compost prepared using the Eichhornia crassipes is subjected to colour, odour and foam were found to be in the acceptable range similar to the commercial compost. The electrical conductivity of both matured compost and commercial compost were analogous to each other. The ratio of carbon was about 15 whereas the nitrogen was one. With the pH of the prepared matured compost was about 7 analogous to the commercial compost, the chemical parameter, such as organic carbon of prepared matured compost and commercial compost with a 1.31% difference. The total nitrogen, total potassium, total phosphorus of the prepared matured compost and commercial compost are similar and within an acceptable range. The total calcium and total magnesium are very low with the maximum acceptable range. The mineral content, such as iron and manganese with a minimal difference, whereas the zinc and copper were within the acceptable limits for both the prepared compost and the commercial compost. In this study, the resource utilization approaches of Eichhornia crassipes by using turn waste into treasure and solve the water hyacinth breeding problem, it could also produce economic and ecological benefits.


Eichhornia crassipes, Organic carbon, Total nitrogen, Total phosphorus, Total potassium, Weeds ecological benefit


  1. CPCB. 2000. Status of municipal solid waste generation, collection, treatment and disposable in class 1 cities. Central Pollution Control Broad, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi.
  2. Narayana, T. 2009. Municipal waste management in India: From waste disposal to recovery of resources. Waste Manage., 29: 1163-1166.
  3. Enein, A. M.A., et al. 2011. Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) solms: From water parasite to potential medicinal remedy. Plant Signaling Behaviour. 6(6): 834-836.
  4. Mironga, J. M., J. M. Mathooko and S. M. Onywere. 2012. Effect of water hyacinth infestation on the physico-chemical characteristics of Lake Naivasha. Int. J. Humanities Social Sci., 2(7): 103-113.
  5. Villamagna, A. M. and B. R. Murphy. 2010. Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): A review. Freshwater Biol., 55(2): 282-289.
  6. Shoeb, F. and H. J. Singh. 2002. Kinetic studies of biogas evolved from water hyacinth. 2nd International Symposium on New technologies for environmental monitoring and agro applications. Proceedings, pp 138.
  7. Rautaray, S. K. 2010. Benefits of mulching with dried water hyacinth or paddy straw. Potato J., 37(1-2): 32-36.
  8. Jafari, N. 2010. Ecological and socio-economic utilization of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes Mart solms). J. Appl. Sci. Env. Manage., 14(2): 43-49.
  9. Teygeler, R. 2000. Water hyacinth paper. Contribution to a sustainable future. In Paper and water. Ed Torley and Gentenaar. Rijswijk, Gentenaar and Torley Publishers. pp 168-188.
  10. Sagar, C. V. and N. A. Kumari. 2010. Sustainable biofuel production from water hyacinth (Eicchornia crassipes). Int. J. Eng. Trends Tech., 4(10): 4454-4458.
  11. Baral, B., G. S. Vaidya and N. Bhattarai. 2011. Bioactivity and biochemical analysis of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). J. Plant Sci., 8: 33-39.
  12. Nyananyo, B. L., A. H. Gijo and E. N. Ogamba. 2007. The physico-chemistry and distribution of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) on the river Nun in the Niger Nelta. J. Appl. Sci. Env. Manage., 11(3).
  13. Friis, B.B., et al. 2000. Formation and emission of N2O and CH4from compost heaps of organic household water. Env. Monitor. Assess., 62(3): 317-331.
  14. Islam, M. S., et al. 2016. Comparison between vermicompost and conventional aerobic compost produced from municipal organic solid waste used in Amaranthus viridis production. J. Env. Sci. Natural Res., 9(2): 43-49.
  15. Sumayya, A. R. and S. Srinivasan. 2016. Proximate analysis of selected green leafy vegetables in freshwater, 75% of silk dyeing effluent and biotreated effluent. J. Chem. Biol. Phys. Sci., 6(1): 20-24.
  16. Jackson, M. L. 1962. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
  17. Cheng, K. L. and R. H. Bray. 1951. Determination of calcium and magnesium in soil and plant material. Soil Sci., 72: 449-458.
  18. Kjeldahl, J. 1883. New method for the determination of nitrogen in organic substances. J. Analytical Chem., 22(1): 366-383.
  19. Olsen, S. R., et al. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Department of Agriculture, WCC-103 Publications, WREP-125 (2nd edn). pp 67-69.
  20. Toth, S. J. and A. L. Prince. 1949. Estimation of cation exchange capacity and exchangable Ca, K and Na contents of soil by flamephotometic techniques. Soil Sci., 67: 439-445.