Anticipated Performance Index Of Tree Species As An Indicator For Green Belt Development In Traffic Density Area

IJEP 41(7): 802-809 : Vol. 41 Issue. 7 (July 2021)

Gopamma D.*, Jagadeeswara Rao K., Suresh Kumar K. and Srinivas N.

GITAM (Deemed to be University), Department of Environmental Science, Institute of Science, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

Air pollution is one of the major environmental problems in the urban atmosphere and green plants act as living filters to absorb and accumulate pollutants from the atmosphere. To assess the plants’ tolerance, the parameters of air pollution tolerance index (APTI) and anticipated performance index (API) in the traffic density area of Visakhapatnam were evaluated. Seventeen tree species were identified growing in the selected study area. The APTI was calculated based on the biochemical analysis of leaf cell sap pH, total chlorophyll content, relative water content (RWC) and ascorbic acid. The air quality in traffic density areas ranged from moderate to high for particulate matter and low to moderate for NOx. Out of 17 species studied, eight tree species (Ficus benghalensis, Eucalyptus citriodora, Mangifera indica, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Syzygium cumini, Azadirachta indica, Bauhinia purpurea and Pongamia pinnata) have shown API values above 81 and are categorized as excellent and can be grown in urban areas. Among them, Azadirachta indica and Pongamia pinnata are suitable for avenue plantation in traffic density areas because of their resistance to pollution and extreme winds during cyclones.

Keywords

Urban plantation, Green belt, Anticipated performance index, Traffic density area

References

  1. Jahan, S. and M. Zafar Iqbal. 1992. Morphological and anatomical studies on leaves of different plants affected by motor vehicle exhaust. J. Islamic Academy Sci., 5(1):21-23.
  2. Joshi, N., A. Chauhan and P.C. Joshi. 2009. Impacts of industrial air pollutants on some biochemical parameters and yield in wheat and mustard plants. The Environmentalist. 29(4):398-404.
  3. Lopez, J.M., et al. 2005. Levels of selected metals in ambient air PM10in an urban site of Zaragoza (Spain). Env. Res., 99(1):58-67.
  4. Madhavi, L.K. and K.V.S. Badarinath. 2005. Spectral solar attenuation due to aerosol urban area in India. Atmos. Res., 7(4):257-266.
  5. CPCB. 1995. Implementation status of the pollution control programme in major polluting industries. Programme objectives serives : Probes/62/ 1994-95. Central Pollution Control Board, Delhi.
  6. Panwar, T.S., D.D.B. Rai and S. Sreekesh. 1997. Ambient air quality status of various cities in India. UEP. 17(11):841-845.
  7. Lakshmi, P.S., K.L. Saravanti and N. Srinivas. 2009. Air pollution tolerance index of various plant species growing in industrial areas. The Eco. Scan., 2(2):203-206.
  8. Escobedo, F.J., et al. 2008. Analyzing the cost-effectiveness of Santiago Chile’s policy of using the urban forest to air quality. J. Env. Manage., 86(1):148-157.
  9. Lin, Y. J. and H. Ding. 2008. Variation in air pollution tolerance index of plants near a steel factory : Implication for landscape-plant species selection for industrial areas. WSEAS Transactions Env. Develop., 4(1):24-32.
  10. Ghosh, G.K. 1992. Plants as bio-indicators of automobile exhaust pollution–A case study of Sangi city. J. Env. Poll., 1:26-28.
  11. Trivedy, M.L. and R.S. Singh. 1995. Reduction in protein contents in few plants as indicators of air pollution. Poll. Res., 14:269-273.
  12. Pandey, M., et al. 2015. Air pollution tolerance index and anticipated performance index of some plant species for development of urban forest. Urban Forestry Urban Greening. 14(4):866-871.
  13. Noor, M.J., et al. 2015. Estimation of anticipated performance index and air pollution tolerance index and of vegetation around the marble industrial areas of Potwar region : Bio-indicators of plant pollution response. Env. Geochem. Health. 37(3):441-455.
  14. Nugrahani, P., et al. 2012. Ornamental shrubs as plant paletts elements and bio-indicators based on air pollution tolerance index, Surabaya city, Indonesia. Asian J. Biol. Sci., 3(2):295-302.
  15. Munshi, A., et al. 2001. TRAIL (APO2-L) induces apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells, that is inhabitable by Bcl-2. Oncogene., 20:3757-3765.
  16. Sumita, M.N., et al. 2003. Tradescantia pallida cv. Purpurea boom in the characterization of air pollution by the accumulation of trace elements. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 53(5):574-579.
  17. Esfahani, A.A., et al. 2013. Assessment of air pollution tolerance index of higher plants suitable for greenbelt development in east of Esfahan city, Iran. J. Ornamental Horticultural Plants. 3(2):87-94.
  18. Kaur, M. and A. Nagpal. 2017. Evaluation of air pollution tolerance index and anticipated performance index of plants and their application in the development of green space alongwith the urban areas. Env. Sci. Poll. Res., 24(23):18881-18895.
  19. Pandey, A. K., et al. 2015. Air pollution tolerance index and anticipated performance index of some plant species for the development of the urban forest. Urban Forestry Urban Greening. 14(4):866-871.
  20. Klumpp, G., et al. 2000. Response of stress indicators and growth parameters of Tibiouchina pulchra Cogn. exposed to air and soil pollution near the industrial complex of Cubatao, Brazil. Sci. Total Env., 246-(1):79-91.
  21. Flowers, M.D., E.L. Fiscus and K.O. Burkay. 2007. Photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and yield of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotype differing in sensitivity to ozone. Env. Exp. Botany. 61:190-198.
  22. Rao, D.N. 1979. Plants as a pollution monitoring device. Fert. News. 24:25-28.
  23. Hoque, M.A., et al. Exogenous proline and glycine betaine increase NaCl-induced ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzyme activities and proline improve salt tolerance more than glycine betaine in tobacco bright yellow-2 suspension-cultured cells. J. Plant Physiol., 164(11):1457-1468.
  24. Singh, S.K. and D.N. Rao. 1983. Evaluation of plants for their tolerance to air pollution. Proceedings of Symposium on air pollution control. Indian Association for Air Pollution Control, New Delhi. pp 218-224.
  25. Agrawal, S. and V. Tiwari. 1997. Susceptibility level of few plants on the basis of air pollution tolerance index. Indian Forester. 123(4):319-322.
  26. Dwivedi, A.K. and B.D. Tripathi. 2007. Pollution tolerance and distribution pattern of plants in surrounding area of coal-fired industries. J. Env. Biol., 28(2):257-263.
  27. Prajapati, S.K. and B. Tripathi. 2008. Seasonal variation of leaf dust accumulation and pigment content in plant species exposed to urban particulates pollution. J. Env. Quality. 37(3):865-870.
  28. Govindaraju, M., et al. 2011. Indentification and evaluation of air pollution tolerant plants around lignite-based thermal power station for greenbelt development. Env. Sci. Poll. Res. Int., 19(4):1210-1223.
  29. Shannigrahi, S., T. Fukusima and R.C. Sharma. 2014. Anticipated air pollution tolerance of some plant species considered for green belt development in and around industrial/urban area in India : An overview. Int. J. Env. Studies. 61(2): 125-137.
  30. Rao, V. L. 2014a. An estimation of air quality indexes of a coastal station-A case study. Int. J. Current Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 3(6):759-763.
  31. Rao, V. L. 2014b. Air quality studies over Visakhapatnam-A case study of a coastal station. Int. J. Innovative Res. Sci. Eng. Tech., 1(3): 8215-8220.
  32. kumar, K. S., N. Srinivas and K.A. Sunil. 2014. Monitoring and assessment of air quality with reference to dust particles (PM10and PM2.5) in urban environment. Int. J. Res. Tech., 3 (16): 42-44.
  33. Gajghate, D. G., A.D. Bhanarkar and P. P. Pradeep. 2013. Atmospheric concentration and fluxes of trace elements in Visakhapatnam city of India. Int. J. Env. Eng., 5 (2): 111-128.
  34. Gupta, S., et al. 2009. Effects of vehicular emissions on biochemical constituents of leaves. Poll. Res., 28:157-160.
  35. Agrawal, S.K. 1986. A new distributional function of foliar phenol concentration in the evaluation of plants for their air pollution tolerance index. Acta Ecol. Sinica. 8 (2):29-36.
  36. Singh, R.P., et al. 2007. Biotechnological approaches to improve phytoremediation efficiency for environment contaminants. In Environmental bioremediation technologies. Ed S.N. Singh and R.D. Tripathi. Springer, Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp 223-258.
  37. Prajapati, S.K. 2012. Ecological effect of airborne particulate matter on plants. Env. Skeptics Critics. 1(1):12-22.
  38. Sen, A., et al. 2017. Eco-physiological evaluation of tree species for bio-monitoring of air quality and identification of air pollution-tolerant species. Env. Monit. Assess., 189(6):262.
  39. Dedio, W. 1979. Water relations in wheat leaves as a screening test for drought resistance. Canadian J. Plant Sci., 55:369-378.
  40. Barrs, H.D. and P.E. Weatherley. 1962. A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficit in leaves. Australian J. Biol. Sci., 15:413-428.
  41. Lohe, R.N., et al. 2015. A comprative study for air pollution tolerance index of some terrestrial plant species. Global J. Env. Sci. Manage., 4(1):3154-324.
  42. Buchchi, B.G., et al. 2013. Evaluation of air pollution tolerance indicate of plant species growing in the vicinity of cement industry and Yogi Vemana University campus. Indian J. Adv. Chem. Sci., 2(1):16-20.
  43. Joshi, O.P., K. Pawar and D.K. Wagela. 1993. Air quality monitoring of Indore city with special references to SO2and tree barks pH. J. Env. Biol., 14:157-162.
  44. Sirajuddin, M., M. Horginamani and M. Ravichandra. 2010. Ambient air quality in an urban area and its effect on plant and human beings : A case study of Tiruchirappali, India. J. Sci. Eng. Tech., 6(2):13-19.
  45. Mondal, D., S. Gupta and J.K. Datta. 2011. Anticipated performance index of some tree species considered of green belt development in an urban area. Int. Res. J. Plant Sci., 2(4):99-106.
  46. Thambavani, S. and D.V. Prathipa. 2012. Assessment of air quality through bio-monitors of selected sites of Didigul town by air pollution tolerance index approach. J. Res. Biol., 3:193-199.
  47. Enete, C., V. Ifeanyi and Ogbonna. 2012. Evaluation of air pollution tolerance index (APTI) of some selected ornamental shrubs in Enugu city, Nigeria. J. Env. Sci. Tech. Food Tech., 1(2):22-25.
  48. Rao, D.N. and F. LeBlanc. 1996. Effect of sulphur dioxide on the lichen, algae with special reference to chlorophyll. The Bryologist. 69(1):89-95.
  49. Giri, S., et al. 2013. Effect of air pollution on chlorophyll content of leaves. Current Agric. Res. J., 1(2):93-98.
  50. Lima, J.S., E.B. Fernandes and W.N. Fawcett. 2000. Mangifera indica and Phaseolus vulgaris in the bio-indication of air pollution in Bahia, Brazil. Ecotoxicol. Env. Safety. 46:275-278.
  51. Chaudhary, C.S. and D.N. Rao. 1997. Study of some factors in plants controlling their susceptibility to sulphur dioxide pollution. Proceeding Indian National Sci. Academy Part B. 46:236-24.
  52. Garg, A., P. Saxena and C. Ghosh. 2015. Evaluation of tolerance and sensitivity of selected plan species with special references to gasoline exhaust pollution. Int. J. Sci. Tech. Res., 4(2):199-207.
  53. Nagendra, H. and D. Gopal. 2010. Street trees in Bangalore: density, diversity, composition and distribution. Urban Urban Green. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug. 2009.1012.1005.
  54. CPWD. 2013. A handbook of landscape. A guide published by Director General. Central Public Works Department, New Delhi.