IJEP 44(11): 1029-1039 : Vol. 44 Issue. 11 (November 2024)
Rajat Sharma, Sumit Kumar and Neeraj Sharma*
Graphic Era (Deemed to be University), Department of Management Studies, Dehradun – 248 002, Uttarakhand, India
Abstract
In the global economic scenario, women are performing exceptionally well because of almost no restrictions and no gender discrimination, but if we consider underdeveloped and emerging economies, the status of women entrepreneurs is still a question mark as in these economies, women are still considered a better familymaker than a business-maker. This article investigates the impact of intellectual capital on marginalized group entrepreneurs existing at the bottom of the pyramid. An exploratory case-based approach has been adopted to understand ‘how a women-owned enterprise in India is able to sustain and survive in uncertain environment conditions and extremely unfavourable situations by crafting innovation and achieving sustainability through her environment-friendly innovation’. The findings from the case highlight the important role of individual entrepreneurial attributes and managerial practices adopted by women entrepreneurs. The study reveals that there is a strong requirement for a robust framework for building entrepreneurial resilience to strengthen the ecosystem for the sustainability of women-based enterprises in India. Thus, based on the current research findings and literature, the researchers have proposed some recommendations that include the need for SMEs to utilize intangible resources efficiently to foster business performance and achieve environmental sustainability.
Keywords
Intellectual capital, Environment-friendly innovation, Knowledge-based view, Marginalized group, SMEs, Sustainability, Women entrepreneurship, Covid-19
References
- Castellino, J. and S. Bradshaw. 2015. Sustainable development and social inclusion: Why a changed approach is central to combating vulnerability. Washington Int. Law J., 24: 459.
- Adom, K. and G. Anambane. 2020. Understanding the role of culture and gender stereotypes in women entrepreneurship through the lens of the stereotype threat theory. J. Entrepreneurship Emerging Eco., 12(1): 100-124.
- Biju, R. and G. Kandathil. 2019. Women entrep-reneurship. Indian J. Ind. Relations.55(1): 182-190.
- Khan, R.U., et al. 2021. Factors affecting women entrepreneurs’ success: A study of small and medium-sized enterprises in emerging market of Pakistan. J. innovation entrepreneurship. 10(1): 1-21.
- Rastogi, M., R. Baral and J. Banu. 2022. What does it take to be a woman entrepreneur? Explorations from India. Industrial and Commercial Training.
- Deng, W., et al. 2020. Science mapping: A biblio-metric analysis of female entrepreneurship studies. Gender Manage. Int. J.,36(1): 61-86.
- Aggarwal, M. and R.K. Johal. 2021. Rural women entrepreneurship: a systematic literature review and beyond. World J. Sci. Tech. Sustain. Develop., 18(4): 373-392.
- Koneru, K. 2017. Women entrepreneurship in India- Problems and prospects. SSRN. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3110340.
- Hazarika, M. K. and M.D.R. Kalita. 2019. Women empowerment through women entrepreneurship: a study of home based enterprises run by women in Sonitpur district of Assam.
- Ogundana, O.M., et al. 2021. Women entrepreneurship in developing economies: A gender-based growth model. J. Small Business Manage., 59 (sup1): S42-S72.
- Roy, S., S. Mohapatra and D. Banerjee. 2022. I mean business: exploring women entrepreneurs’ journey in India from an emancipation perspective. J. Entrepreneurship Emerging Eco.,14(6): 1072-1095.
- Džananoviæ, Ð. and N. Tandir. 2020. Motivational and limiting factors for female entrepreneurship. Open J. Res. Eco.,3(1): 1-8.
- Itani, H., Y.M. Sidani and I. Baalbaki. 2011. United Arab Emirates female entrepreneurs: Motivations and frustrations. Equality Diversity Inclusion Int. J., 30(5): 409-424.
- Jamali, D. 2009. Constraints and opportunities facing women entrepreneurs in developing countries: A relational perspective. Gender Manage. Int. J., 24(4): 232-251.
- Verheul, I., A.V. Stel and R. Thurik. 2006. Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. Entrepreneurship Regional Develop., 18(2): 151-183.
- Bottomley, G. 2020. Women on the move: Migration and feminism. InEthnicity, class and gender in Australia. Routledge. pp 98-108.
- Kaushik, S. 2013. Challenges faced by women entrepreneurs in India. Education. 35(53): 53.
- Nigam, A.K., et al. 2020. Female empowerment: A life-cycle analysis. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Dutta, J., et al. 2023. Creating wealth from agrowaste: Success stories from India. In Agriculture waste management and bioresource: The circular economy perspective. pp 294-314.
- Kacar, S.O., C. Essers and Y. Benschop. 2023. A contextual analysis of entrepreneurial identity and experience: Women entrepreneurs in Turkey. Entrepreneurship Regional Develop., 1-22.
- Porter, E. G. and K. V. Nagarajan. 2005. Successful women entrepreneurs as pioneers: Results from a study conducted in Karaikudi, Tamil Nadu, India. J. Small Business Entrepreneurship.18(1): 39-52.
- Shah, H. 2013. Creating an enabling environment for women’s entrepreneurship in India. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), New Delhi.
- Shastri, S., et al. 2022. Exploring women entrepreneurs’ motivations and challenges from an institutional perspective: Evidences from a patriarchal state in India. J. Enterprising Communities People Places Global Eco., 16(4): 653-674.
- Rashid, S. and V. Ratten. 2020. A systematic literature review on women entrepreneurship in emerging economies while reflecting specifically on SAARC countries. In Entrepreneurship and organizational change: Managing innovation and creative capabilities. Springer Cham. pp 37-88.
- Elyachar, J. 2012. Next practices: Knowledge, infrastructure, nd public goods at the bottom of the pyramid. Public Culture. 24(1): 109-129.
- Prahalad, C.K. 2005. The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
- Karnani, A. G. 2006. Fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: A mirage. Ross School of Business paper no. 1035. California Manage. Review Forthcoming.
- Yu, K., Y. Zhang and Y. Huang. 2023. Entrepreneurship at the bottom of the pyramid: A systematic literature review. Sustain.,15(3): 2480.
- Musona, J., et al. 2021. Sustainable entrepreneurship at the bottom of the pyramid: An identity-based perspective. Sustain.,13(2): 812.
- Sarkar, S. 2020. Grassroots entrepreneurs and social change at the bottom of the pyramid: the role of bricolage. InSocial entrepreneurship and bricolage. Routledge. pp 160-188.
- Sergi, B.S., et al. 2019. Entrepreneurship and economic growth: The experience of developed and developing countries. InEntrepreneurship and development in the 21st century. Emerald publishing limited. pp 3-32
- Sinkovics, N., R. R. Sinkovics and M. Yamin. 2014. The role of social value creation in business model formulation at the bottom of the pyramid– Implications for MNEs? Int. Business Review.23(4): 692-707.
- Dolan, C., M.J. Louis and L. Scott. 2012. Shampoo, saris and SIM cards: Seeking entrepreneurial futures at the bottom of the pyramid. Gender Develop.,20(1): 33-47.
- Shaw, E., et al. 2013. Exploring contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. Int. Small Business J.,31(5): 580-599.
- Sutrisno, S., et al. 2024. Do entrepreneurship education and peer groups promote students’ entrepreneurial intention during Covid-19 pandemic? The mediating role of entrepreneurial mindset. Calitatea. 25(201): 181-195.
- Singh, G. and R. Belwal. 2008. Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Ethiopia: Evaluating the role, prospects and problems faced by women in this emergent sector.Gender manage int. j., 23(2): 120-136.
- Patwa, N., et al. 2021. Towards a circular economy: An emerging economies context. J. business Res., 122: 725-735.
- Shaikh, E., M.N. Tunio and F. Qureshi. 2022. Finance and women’s entrepreneurship in DETEs: A literature review. Entrepreneurial Finance Innovation Develop., 191-209.
- Jain, R. 2020. Gender diversity, gender norms and firm performance: Evidence from India. Eco. Systems. 46(4): 101006.
- Meng, L., M. Qamruzzaman and A.H.E. Adow. 2021. Technological adaption and open innovation in SMEs: An strategic assessment for women-owned SMEs sustainability in Bangladesh. Sustain.,13(5): 2942.
- Mahajan, R. and K.R. Bandyopadhyay. 2021. Women entrepreneurship and sustainable development: Select case studies from the sustainable energy sector. J. Enterprising Communities People Places Global Eco., 15(1): 42-75.
- Kamberidou, I. 2020. Distinguished women entrepreneurs in the digital economy and the multitasking whirlpool. J. Innovation Entrepreneurship.9(1): 3.
- Parmar, D. K., et al. 2011. Women entrepreneurs and empowerment in India. Gujarat J. Extension Education.22: 115-119.
- Selvi, V.D. and H.S. Farveen. 2012. Risk awareness of women entrepreneurs.RAC J. Res.,2(5): 21-25.
- Xavier, S. R., et al. 2012. Women entrepreneurs: Making a change from employment to small and medium business ownership. Procedia Eco. Finance. 4: 321-334.
- Kumar, N. and L. K. Singh. 2021. Status of women-entrepreneur in Indian startups. Int. J. Eng. Tech. Manage. Sci.,5(2): 1-12.
- Roomi, M. A. and G. Parrott. 2008. Barriers to development and progression of women entrepreneurs in Pakistan. J. Entrepreneurship. 17(1): 59-72.
- Ely, A., et al. 2013. Innovation politics post-Rio+20: Hybrid pathways to sustainability? Env. Planning C Politics Space. 31(6): 1063–1081.
- Hess, D. 2007. Alternative pathways in science and industry. MIT Press, Massachusetts.
- Thackara, J. 2015. How to thrive in the next economy: Designing tomorrow’s world today. Thames and Hudson, London.
- Truffer, B. 2003. User-led innovation processes: The development of professional car sharing by environmentally concerned citizens. Innovation European J. Social Sci Res., 16(2): 139–154.
- Jorgensen, U. and P. Karnoe. 1995. The Danish wind-turbine story: Technical solutions to political visions? In Managing technology in society: The approach of constructive technology assessment. Ed A. Rip, T. J. Misa and J. Scott. Pinter, London. pp 57-82.
- Fressoli, M., et al. 2014. When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: Implications for models of inclusive innovation. Innovation Develop., 4(2): 277–292.
- Smith, A. and A. Stirling. 2018. Innovation, sus-tainability and democracy: An analysis of grassroots contributions. J. Self-Governance Manage. Eco., 6(1): 64-97.
- Cooper, C., et al. 2023. Extending the resource and knowledge based view: Insights from new contexts of analysis. J. Business Res.,156: 113523.
- Singh, S. K., et al. 2021. Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. J. Business Res.,128: 788-798.
- Kengatharan, N. 2019. A knowledge-based theory of the firm: Nexus of intellectual capital, productivity and firms’ performance. Int. J. Manpower. 40(6): 1056-1074.
- Galbraith, J. K. 1969. Intellectual capital.
- Stuart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organisations. Long Range Planning. 30(6): 953.
- Alvino, F., et al. 2021. Intellectual capital and sustainable development: A systematic literature review. J. Intellectual Capital.22(1): 76-94.
- Lewis, T. and M. S. Cardon. 2020. The magnetic value of entrepreneurial passion for potential employees. J. Business Venturing Insights. 14: e00193.
- Al-Qershi, N., S.S.M. Mokhtar and Z.B. Abas. 2020. Innovative CRM and performance of SMEs: The moderating role of relational capital.J. Open Innovation Tech. Market Complexity.6(4): 155.
- Baikuni, A., et al. 2022. Framework of intellectual capital-based view in improving firm agility. J. Business Manage. Studies.4(3): 1-10.
- Arafat, M. Y., et al. 2020. Intellectual and cognitive aspects of women entrepreneurs in India.Int. J. Knowledge Manage. Studies. 11(3): 278-297.
- Brush, C., et al. 2017. The influence of human capital factors and context on women’s entrepreneurship: Which matters more? J. Business Venturing Insights.8: 105-113.
- Maden, C. 2015. A gendered lens on entrepreneurship: Women entrepreneurship in Turkey. Gender Manage. Int. J.,30(4): 312-331.
- Sarkar, S. and M. Pansera. 2017. Sustainability-driven innovation at the bottom: Insights from grassroots ecopreneurs. Tech. Forecasting Social Change. 114: 327-338.
- Kray, L.J. and J.A. Kennedy. 2017. Changing the narrative: Women as negotiators and leaders. California Manage. Review. 60(1): 70-87.
- Rosca, E., N. Agarwal and A. Brem. 2020. Women entrepreneurs as agents of change: A comparative analysis of social entrepreneurship processes in emerging markets. Tech. Forecasting Social Change. 157: 120067.
- Monteith, W. and L. Camfield. 2019. Business as family, family as business: Female entrepreneurship in Kampala, Uganda. Geoforum.101: 111-121.
- Kanapathipillai, K. and S.F. Azam. 2019. Women entrepreneurs path to success: An investigation of the critical success factors in Malaysia. European J. Human Resour. Manage. Studies. 3(1): 106-
129. - Setini, M., et al. 2020. The passway of women entrepreneurship: Starting from social capital with open innovation, through to knowledge sharing and innovative performance. J. Open Innovation Tech. Market Complexity.6(2): 25.
- Plowman, D.A., et al. 2007. The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization. leadership quarterly.18(4): 341-356.
- Chatterjee, C. and S. Ramu. 2018. Gender and its rising role in modern Indian innovation and entrepre-neurship. IIMB Manage. Review.30(1): 62-72.
- Wasim, J., et al. 2020. Nonfamily knowledge during family business succession: A cultural understanding. Int. J. Entrepreneurial Behavior Res., 26(1): 141-157.
- Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research design and methods (5th edn). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.
- Davies, I. A., H. Haugh and L. Chambers. 2019. Barriers to social enterprise growth. J. Small Business Manage., 57(4): 1616-1636.
- Goyal, S., A. Agrawal and B.S. Sergi. 2021. Social entrepreneurship for scalable solutions addressing sustainable development goals (SDGs) at BoP in India. Qualitative Res. Organizations Manage Int. J., 16(3/4): 509-529.
- Sullivan, D.M. and W.R. Meek. 2012. Gender and entrepreneurship : A review and process model. J. Manage. Psychol., 27(5): 428-458.